We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"They've recently improved the ease of implementation."
"What I have found the most valuable about GoldenGate is that it does real-time and no-downtime migrations. Its migrations are fast. There are not many tools like it on the marketplace."
"It moves the data as you set it up, and it works. I am also very impressed with its stability and scalability. It is not super feature-rich, but the new releases have more functionality. It recently had more native integrations with Oracle Database. If you are using it against an Oracle database, it has a lot more functionality."
"The most valuable feature is data replication capability."
"The CDC feature is interesting."
"GoldenGate can connect and collect data from multiple sources, such as SQL Server."
"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."
"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."
"I would like to see the interface more graphical and easier to use."
"Troubleshooting issues is not always the easiest. It should be easier to troubleshoot. Their support can also be improved. They don't read your problem statement and waste a lot of time. GoldenGate for big data is actually a separate license. It is sort of a separate product, but it might fall underneath your GoldenGate category. If we're talking about big data, its interaction with big data sources is poorly documented."
"We struggle with memory. It's limited. However, it may be because of our unique business case and how we use it that it's limiting for us."
"The problem with GoldenGate is it is very complex to use. You need heavyweight skills to use it."
"It should be easier to integrate this solution with non-Oracle databases, including cloud-based solutions hosted on Azure."
"The solution is quite costly, and if they could reduce their pricing, it would be more economical to implement."
"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."
"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."
"The price of this solution is good."
"We have an enterprise license for it. It might be for three years or so. I'm not aware of any additional costs to the standard licensing fee."
Qlik Compose comes in two offerings: Qlik Compose for Data Warehouses and Qlik Compose for Data Lakes. Qlik Compose for Data Warehouse automates and streamlines the design, creation, loading, management, and update of data warehouses including Amazon Redshift, Azure Synapse, Google BigQuery, Snowflake and Oracle. Qlik Compose for Data Lakes automates the process of providing continuously updated, accurate, and trusted data to big data platforms like Apache Hadoop, Cloudera Customer Data Platform and Databricks Unified Data Analytics Platform.
Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 7th in Data Integration Tools with 6 reviews while Qlik Compose is ranked 36th in Data Integration Tools with 2 reviews. Oracle GoldenGate is rated 7.4, while Qlik Compose is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Good technical support and very stable, but memory is an issue". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qlik Compose writes "Excellent data integration but needs better scheduling and monitoring features". Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Quest SharePlex, Qlik Replicate and Azure Data Factory, whereas Qlik Compose is most compared with Qlik Replicate, Talend Open Studio, Azure Data Factory, Palantir Foundry and WhereScape RED. See our Oracle GoldenGate vs. Qlik Compose report.
We monitor all Data Integration Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.