Compare Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP HANA

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is ranked 18th in Relational Databases with 2 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 5th in Relational Databases with 9 reviews. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is rated 8.0, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service writes "Offers multiple reliable databases but their technical support needs improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "We can get more tenders because of the lower cost while providing a better product or service". Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is most compared with EDB Postgres Advanced Server, Altibase and SQL Server, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database and Teradata. See our Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP HANA report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP HANA and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The stability of the solution is very good. I wouldn't have used it for the past seven years if I was not satisfied.The scalability of the database is absolutely guaranteed by the new features.

Read more »

The data storage requirement is reduced from the original database to the HANA database.The functionality is of the solution is very good.One feature I find very valuable, is the response time of the application on the database memory.Integration is the most valuable feature we use SAP HANA for.The most value for us was in terms of using it to issue tenders online. We host our server, but it is open to the public, so clients who want to buy those tenders were able to go online, put their tender documents up, and we could evaluate them using SAP.If you want to scale with new processes and new reports, that's fairly easy.This solution is very fast.It has a very huge bandwidth and data transfer.

Read more »

Cons
Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync.The support is not that great. They're not really supporting directly anymore and relying on experts to figure out technical issues.

Read more »

I think that the pricing is high and it needs improvement.The challenge right now is all databases are on S4 HANA architecture. You're running it for HANA, but not all the functionalities are available. If they can speed up getting all the databases on S4 HANA that would help.If the developers were to enhance or improve the application logic while processing the transactions, that would be great.FI, or the financial module of SAP, has room for improvement. It has to have some better localization for the Middle East, especially in regards to taxes and the letter of credit cycle. I would like to see better localization from the HCM.The interface is a little bit hard to customize. You almost have to consult the SAP original developer to change it.In terms of improvement, the speed is not as good as we thought it would be. That is why we are trying different solutions that will be built with different technologies.The inclusion of a well-performing Time Machine is vital.The solution is very expensive, however. The pricing depends on the number of users and many other factors that affect licensing.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
People who are technical will accept the cost, but financially they will assess whether this solution will bring them revenue or not. People often ask, how will I profit when the cost is so high?Set up a consortium of consulting partners and hardware vendors to define your tech. Landscape TCO (total cost of ownership) and then approach the OEM for pricing (on-premise or on cloud or a hybrid model). Check if you can bring your own licenses for some of the existing application licenses on the new platform, to reduce TCO.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
18th
Views
388
Comparisons
228
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
292
Avg. Rating
8.0
5th
Views
10,328
Comparisons
8,438
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
425
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
SAP High-Performance Analytic Appliance, HANA
Learn
Oracle
SAP
Overview
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

The SAP HANA® platform helps you reimagine business by combining a robust database with services for creating innovative applications. It enables real-time business by converging trans-actions and analytics on one in-memory platform. Running on premise or in the cloud, SAP HANA untangles IT complexity, bringing huge savings in data management and empowering decision makers everywhere with new insight and predictive power.

Offer
Learn more about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service
Learn more about SAP HANA
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Unilever, NHS 24, adidas Group, CHIO Aachen, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), Bangkok Airways Public Company Limited
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider10%
Retailer7%
Media Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP HANA and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email