Compare Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. OutSystems

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pega, Microsoft, Appian and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pros »

"You can go huge - so it is definitely a scalable solution.""One thing I like about OutSystems is that there's no lock-in. You can keep running your applications because it's on .NET and hosted centrally. That's one of the advantages I see there in terms of not having an IT strategy that has a dependency on a particular platform.""We have no complaints surrounding both the scalability and stability of this solution.""I like the mobile features the most, and there are also various features around the portal we created that I enjoy."

More OutSystems Pros »

Cons
"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Cons »

"It needs improvement in the AI capability.""The integration points need to be increased. People have also started to adopt this solution for their regular needs. That means it's not only the big enterprises that are adopting this solution. There are also small and medium enterprises that are adopting it. I've read that where you have large deployments, OutSystems starts to crumble a bit. That is the idea that no customer would know at the beginning and would also not like to hit the wall there. When it is on the client, there are a lot of applications already on low-code, and then suddenly you realize that you want to do some big applications, and you face hurdles. This is the general feedback for all such platforms.""The technical features are good, but the actual commercialization is out of reach.""Since we first started using OutSystems, they switched their language support from Java and .NET to .NET only, which was a bit of a surprise. Their language support could be better in this sense, although on our resource side it is now a bit more flexible."

More OutSystems Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice »

"For a single application, it's too expensive.""OutSystems is a good solution, but it's not cheap.""I think the pricing for OutSystems is comparable with similar solutions. I would place it somewhere in the middle. We pay for the bundle and don't pay anything extra in terms of licensing and other fees."

More OutSystems Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,405
Comparisons
1,980
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
339
Rating
5.0
Views
9,325
Comparisons
6,897
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
612
Rating
6.3
Popular Comparisons
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Learn
Oracle
OutSystems
Overview

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is a cloud-based software development Platform as a Service (PaaS) and a hosted environment for your application development infrastructure. It provides an open-source standards-based solution to develop, collaborate on, and deploy applications within Oracle Cloud.

OutSystems is the number one platform for low-code rapid application development. Thousands of customers worldwide trust OutSystems as only solution that combines the power of low-code development with advanced mobile capabilities, enabling visual development of entire application portfolios that easily integrate with existing systems.
Offer
Learn more about Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service
Learn more about OutSystems
Sample Customers
Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool ProductsRandstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company53%
Comms Service Provider16%
Energy/Utilities Company4%
Media Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider22%
Retailer6%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise69%
Find out what your peers are saying about Pega, Microsoft, Appian and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 16th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 1 review while OutSystems is ranked 8th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 5 reviews. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 5.0, while OutSystems is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "An over-priced, complicated solution that does what it was developed to do". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "Great platform, very stable and it does automatic dependency checking: very useful for enterprise environments". Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Oracle Java Cloud Service, Oracle Developer Cloud Service, Studio Creatio and Microsoft Azure, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft PowerApps, Appian, Mendix, Pega BPM and Temenos Quantum.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.