We performed a comparison between OutSystems and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The flow editor is the most valuable feature. It is simple and intuitive, and it can guide you step-by-step."
"We used almost all of the features, themes, styling guide, and approach components. They are useful in our applications."
"Integrations with external systems with SOAP and REST are easy to implement off-the-shelf, but a developer can always implement specific libraries for other integrations."
"The scratch coding is useful. The solution is easy to understand."
"OutSystems is easy to use."
"One thing I like about OutSystems is that there's no lock-in. You can keep running your applications because it's on .NET and hosted centrally. That's one of the advantages I see there in terms of not having an IT strategy that has a dependency on a particular platform."
"We can quickly develop an application using the tool."
"Their out-of-the-box UI is quite good."
"Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors."
"I think OutSystems needs to improve in many areas. First, sometimes Service Studio becomes really slow and even hangs for long periods. Also, if I have not published my module in some time, and some kind of Service Studio exception occurs, I lose my work."
"There is room for improvement in technical support."
"It needs improvement in the AI capability."
"Currently, in mobile applications, we don't have push notifications."
"One of the biggest areas for improvement is that every time an existing data element is modified, it creates a new data element. It doesn't really modify that particular data element. So, a user has to follow an extra step of removing the existing data element and bringing in the new and modified data element that is being added, which sort of goes into negative productivity."
"The solution's testing framework needs to be improved, and the workflow should be slightly more mature."
"The installation is a bit tedious."
"The asynchronous processing and multithreading tasks for which the current resources of the platform are very generic and not built for the end-user. Any asynchronous jobs have to be constructed with an end-user dashboard to allow inspection of the status of the activities."
"The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon."
OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 46 reviews while Unqork is ranked 24th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. OutSystems is rated 8.4, while Unqork is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of OutSystems writes "Useful natural speech to algorithm, reliable, and beneficial automatic task". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unqork writes "Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support". OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Xamarin Platform, whereas Unqork is most compared with Pega BPM, Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Salesforce Platform and ServiceNow Now Platform.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.