We performed a comparison between Appian and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."There is no need to worry about vulnerabilities in the system, because Appian built a secure system."
"The solution's most valuable features are the regular periodic and quarterly updates, they are very useful updates. They keep improving the solution more often, and that helps the platform or code always be up to date with the latest features."
"Good workflow engines that bridge the gaps of processes."
"Technical support has been amazing overall."
"The process models provide self-documenting systems."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The setup is easy."
"The Application Designer is very user friendly. There are also lot of plug-ins that you can use and, for the most part, they are free."
"Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors."
"What could be improved is more on the front end perspective, like the user interface and the mobile application aspect."
"The ability of the interface to load automatic data is not great."
"A point of improvement would be the SAIL forms. The built-in tool used to generate forms does not have debugging support (to view local variables as they change on live preview, and step-by-step valuation) which is a big drawback for form development. Moreover, the script language used to build SAIL forms does not support inheritance or lambda expressions (functions as arguments of other functions), which makes the code base more verbose."
"There are four areas I believe Appian could improve in. The first is a seamless contact center integration. Appian does not have a contact center feature. The second is advanced features in RPA. The third would be chatbot and email bot integration—while Appian comes with chatbot and email bot, it's not as mature as it should be, compared to the competition. The fourth area would be next best action, since there is not much of this sort of feature in Appian. These are all features which competitors' products have, and in a mature manner, whereas Appian lacks on these four areas. I see customers who are moving from Appian to Pega because these features are not in Appian."
"Offline capabilities and responsive capabilities could be better. The mobility features of Appian platform are still evolving."
"The UI of Appian is more internal. Recently, there has been an addition of an external user portal for the customer-facing stuff. It's still coming out."
"Architecture of product and scalabiility issues."
"Something I would like to see improved is an SQL database connection."
"The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon."
Appian is ranked 6th in Rapid Application Development Software with 57 reviews while Unqork is ranked 24th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. Appian is rated 8.4, while Unqork is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unqork writes "Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Nintex Process Platform, whereas Unqork is most compared with Pega BPM, Microsoft Power Apps, Salesforce Platform, OutSystems and ServiceNow Now Platform.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
