We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."There are a lot of frameworks in the product. I use Pega PRPC the most."
"The user interface and the ease of developing the workflow for an application are valuable features."
"Overall, the ability to integrate with multiple applications and effective case management is the most valuable."
"The solution's case management is its most valuable aspect."
"Application development is very rapid. A lot of code gets reused while building the applications, which is something we highly appreciate."
"The workflows are the most valuable features, particularly for us, because we were attempting to automate processes by utilizing workflows to provide a hands-off comparison between the bot and the human."
"The most valuable features are case management and integration services."
"The solution is operating well overall."
"Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors."
"Pega BPM can improve product management, case management, omnichannel, CDH, and the customer data hub. All the major domains can improve. Additionally, more AI functionality and proper integrations with Pega RPA would be helpful."
"It should have integration with non-relational databases. A lot of databases are non-relational, and as a company, we are planning to move to NoSQL or open-source databases. It would be good if we are able to install and use Pega on a NoSQL database. They can also try to tailor or organize the company a bit differently and go more towards the microservice concept. I would like Pega to develop machine learning and intelligent AI algorithms. They have a good foundation in terms of the model and the stuff that we are using for some customers, and it will be good to onboard as many machine learning algorithms as possible."
"The initial setup takes time."
"The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother."
"The UI part needs improvement."
"This is an expensive solution."
"I would like to see Pega BPM improve the user experience."
"There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will be moving away from HTML5."
"The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon."
Pega BPM is ranked 7th in Rapid Application Development Software with 55 reviews while Unqork is ranked 24th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while Unqork is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unqork writes "Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA, whereas Unqork is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Salesforce Platform, OutSystems and ServiceNow Now Platform.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.