Compare Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs. Zscaler Cloud Sandbox

Palo Alto Networks WildFire is ranked 1st in Advanced Threat Protection with 11 reviews while Zscaler Cloud Sandbox is ranked 17th in Advanced Threat Protection. Palo Alto Networks WildFire is rated 8.6, while Zscaler Cloud Sandbox is rated 0. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks WildFire writes "Good technical support and provides automatic analysis that saves us time in filtering email". On the other hand, Palo Alto Networks WildFire is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Firepower NGFW, Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco ASA NGFW and Juniper SRX, whereas Zscaler Cloud Sandbox is most compared with FireEye Network Security and Fortinet FortiEDR.
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Zscaler Cloud Sandbox? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, FireEye, RSA and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: July 2020.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
This solution is very pricey and it depends on the package that you implement.We pay between $3,000 and $4,000 CAD ($2,200 - $3,000 USD) per year to maintain this solution.The licensing fees are on an annual basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard fees.It's pretty expensive but with respect to value for money, it's okay.It is a reasonable price compared to other solutions on the market.The pricing is OK, it is not too expensive.

More Palo Alto Networks WildFire Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection solutions are best for your needs.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Popular Comparisons
Palo Alto Networks
WildFire™ cloud-based threat analysis service is the industry’s most advanced analysis and prevention engine for highly evasive zero-day exploits and malware. The cloud-based service employs a unique multi-technique approach combining dynamic and static analysis, innovative machine learning techniques, and a groundbreaking bare metal analysis environment to detect and prevent even the most evasive threats.

Today’s appliance-based sandboxing solutions are expensive and, therefore, typically installed only in the data center. When users leave the network, they become exposed to new threats because sandbox protection can’t follow them. Traditional sandboxes usually operate out of line, allowing traffic through while inspecting suspicious files in TAP mode. If a threat is detected in the sandbox, it sends alerts, but they can arrive too late. Traditional sandboxes also lack the ability to fully inspect SSL traffic due to hardware limitations—and many malware authors are exploiting those limitations to distribute their malicious payloads. In order to provide sandbox protection, organizations have bolted sandboxing solutions onto their existing security stacks. It helps, but achieving a fully integrated threat platform across multiple products is nearly impossible.

For more details:

Learn more about Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Learn more about Zscaler Cloud Sandbox
Sample Customers
Novamedia, Nexon Asia Pacific, Lenovo, Samsonite, IOOF, Sinogrid, SanDisk CorporationZenith Live, Azure, Carlsberg Group
Top Industries
Comms Service Provider17%
Construction Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider18%
Media Company6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, FireEye, RSA and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: July 2020.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.