Compare Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM vs. SCCM
Use Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM? Share your opinion.
 | OmidKoushki Network Specialist at KIAN company |
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCL, Red Hat and others in Configuration Management. Updated: February 2021.
465,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Information Not Available
"The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for."
"Pricing is negotiable with Microsoft, depending upon which of their packages you choose."
"When you compare this solution with other tools in the market you might actually find a lot of variation in the pricing and that's why people opt for the other tools rather than Microsoft tools."
"Its price is okay because it is part of our licensing."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
465,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Views
145
Comparisons
103
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
45,167
Comparisons
29,401
Reviews
20
Average Words per Review
484
Rating
8.1
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
System Center Configuration Manager
Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM allows IT to maximize investments. It enables administrators to leverage existing processes by using SCCM as the single pane of glass to manage both PCs and Mac computers.
With System Center Configuration Manager, you can manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving your employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose.
Learn more about Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM
Learn more about SCCM
Luton Sixth Form College, Slalom Consulting, City of Reykjavik
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
No Data Available
Computer Software Company21%
Financial Services Firm14%
Insurance Company14%
Construction Company14%
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government8%
Manufacturing Company4%
No Data Available
Small Business28%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise50%
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise86%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCL, Red Hat and others in Configuration Management. Updated: February 2021.
465,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM is ranked 28th in Configuration Management while SCCM is ranked 1st in Configuration Management with 20 reviews. Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM is rated 0.0, while SCCM is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCCM writes "Works well with Windows, very stable, and can scale well". Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM is most compared with , whereas SCCM is most compared with Ansible, BigFix, Quest KACE Systems Management, Ivanti Patch for Windows and Chef.
See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.
We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.