We performed a comparison between Pentera and Rapid7 InsightVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"Maybe there are some remediation steps on the website, we can mask sensitive information on the website better."
"The product is easy to use."
"What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach."
"The most valuable feature of Pentera is that you can do continuous vulnerability assessment, which is automated."
"The most valuable features are its reporting capabilities and the host discovery functionality."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The solution works well."
"NeXpose is a pretty good vulnerability scanner... There's a nice dashboard."
"InsightVM's best features are the vulnerability database and remediation steps."
"InsightVM offers a robust platform for identifying, prioritizing, and addressing vulnerabilities across an organization's IT infrastructure."
"The most valuable feature for us is the different types of reporting it provides."
"InsightVM's most valuable feature is risk scoring, a formula based on different vectors like the ease of exploitation and the availability of the machine."
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"Maybe scalability. I know that the Pentera right now is high level in order to scan big deals over 500 IPs and not less, and not less. That can be more granular. This will be useful."
"The price could be improved."
"Pentera's general dashboards could be improved and made more specific in terms of vulnerabilities that I'm discovering."
"There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility."
"The reporting could be better."
"The integration with other solutions like JIRA could be better. Perhaps there could be some additional updates in the next phase that could integrate with it, so then you can proceed with the VT much easier."
"This solution creates false-positives which can cause issues with reporting."
"The drawback is that it is still not a fully SaaS solution, so you must deploy a console."
"The reporting is a little bit tricky because it can be difficult to exactly pinpoint some of the assets to filter them and generate a report."
"InsightVM could be improved by providing passive scanning as an option."
"There have been instances where technical support takes a long time to update the status of a ticket, which is something that can be improved."
"The solution needs to improve its vulnerability design to include CVC results."
Pentera is ranked 15th in Vulnerability Management with 5 reviews while Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews. Pentera is rated 8.2, while Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Pentera writes "A stable solution that can be used to do continuous and automated vulnerability assessments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". Pentera is most compared with Cymulate, Tenable Nessus, Picus Security, Horizon3.ai and Veracode, whereas Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM).
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.