We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"You have the liberty of physically executing a specific set of rules in your environment."
"The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge."
"Let's say if a customer's environment has 10 security devices and they need to know that there is an attack that has bypassed their devices, they cannot go and inspect every device and every rule in their security devices."
"The integration engine needs to improve."
"They have certain price ranges for their products, depending upon the use cases, and the number of applications the customer wants to try."
Independent from any vendor or technology, the unparalleled Picus Platform is designed to continuously measure the effectiveness of security defenses by using emerging threat samples in production environments. Created by a team that’s been working together more than 10 years already and has proven their expertise in enterprise cybersecurity, Picus is trusted by many large multinational corporations and government agencies.
Equipped with FireEye frontline intelligence, the Verodin platform will measure and test security environments against both known and newly discovered threats, empowering organizations to identify risks in their security controls before a breach occurs, and rapidly adapt their defenses to the evolving threat landscape.
Picus Security is ranked 8th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 1 review while Verodin is ranked 1st in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 1 review. Picus Security is rated 0.0, while Verodin is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Picus Security writes "Offers the ability to physically execute a specific set of rules in your environment but doesn't provide patches automatically". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". Picus Security is most compared with Cymulate, AttackIQ, SafeBreach, XM Cyber HaXM and Pentera, whereas Verodin is most compared with AttackIQ, Cymulate, SafeBreach, XM Cyber HaXM and Pentera.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.