We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Picus Security vs. Verodin

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Picus Security Logo
926 views|498 comparisons
Verodin Logo
2,162 views|1,444 comparisons
Top Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"You have the liberty of physically executing a specific set of rules in your environment."

More Picus Security Pros »

"The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge."

More Verodin Pros »

"Let's say if a customer's environment has 10 security devices and they need to know that there is an attack that has bypassed their devices, they cannot go and inspect every device and every rule in their security devices."

More Picus Security Cons »

"The integration engine needs to improve."

More Verodin Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They have certain price ranges for their products, depending upon the use cases, and the number of applications the customer wants to try."

More Picus Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
542,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: You have the liberty of physically executing a specific set of rules in your environment.
Top Answer: It's a different region they're targeting at the moment. I think it's a fair price for us. I work with a distributor, which basically reorganizes or comes up with another pricing model for the… more »
Top Answer: Picus tells you that an attack has bypassed your security controls, but it doesn't tell you exactly where, or on which device the attack has been bypassed. I think that is one of the key components or… more »
Top Answer: The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge.
Top Answer: I wasn't involved at the very end when it came to the discussion of pricing. At the time of the pricing of the solution, it's my understanding that the pricing model that they had for this solution… more »
Top Answer: The integration engine needs to improve. We try to integrate it with other tools, especially with Splunk or with the MyDLP engine, and even with Microsoft Exchange. As much as they tried to make it… more »
Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Learn More

Independent from any vendor or technology, the unparalleled Picus Platform is designed to continuously measure the effectiveness of security defenses by using emerging threat samples in production environments. Created by a team that’s been working together more than 10 years already and has proven their expertise in enterprise cybersecurity, Picus is trusted by many large multinational corporations and government agencies.

Equipped with FireEye frontline intelligence, the Verodin platform will measure and test security environments against both known and newly discovered threats, empowering organizations to identify risks in their security controls before a breach occurs, and rapidly adapt their defenses to the evolving threat landscape.

Learn more about Picus Security
Learn more about Verodin
Sample Customers
Akbank, Exclusive Networks, Garanti, ING Bank, QNB Finansbank, Turkcell, Vodafone, Yapı Kredi
AAFCU, Amuse, Axway, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, BCC Corporation, Blackboat, CapWealth Advisors, CBC, CERN, Lagardère, Land Bank of the Philippines, laya healthcare, Lindsay Automotive Group
Top Industries
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider29%
Financial Services Firm12%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm9%

Picus Security is ranked 8th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 1 review while Verodin is ranked 1st in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 1 review. Picus Security is rated 0.0, while Verodin is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Picus Security writes "Offers the ability to physically execute a specific set of rules in your environment but doesn't provide patches automatically". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". Picus Security is most compared with Cymulate, AttackIQ, SafeBreach, XM Cyber HaXM and Pentera, whereas Verodin is most compared with AttackIQ, Cymulate, SafeBreach, XM Cyber HaXM and Pentera.

See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.