Pure Storage FlashArray vs. Reduxio

As of June 2019, Pure Storage FlashArray is ranked 3rd in All-Flash Storage Arrays with 81 reviews vs Reduxio which is ranked 6th in All-Flash Storage Arrays with 26 reviews. The top reviewer of Pure Storage FlashArray writes "The data reduction technology part of the scalability has been impressive, like its ability to host additional workloads, volumes of data, and databases". The top reviewer of Reduxio writes "Intuitive graphical interface makes it easy to operate, and the "time machine" Snapshotting enables us to roll back to any point in time". Pure Storage FlashArray is most compared with Dell EMC Unity, NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS) and Nimble Storage. Reduxio is most compared with Nimble Storage, Unitrends and Pure Storage FlashArray. See our Pure Storage FlashArray vs. Reduxio report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Pure Storage FlashArray Logo
56,520 views|22,977 comparisons
Reduxio Logo
6,342 views|1,093 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage FlashArray vs. Reduxio and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
348,558 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The solution has probably reduced my power use substantially.It gives us capacity planning.The most valuable feature is its speed.All our junior partners can administer the storage arrays. It is simple and easy to use. We don't have to dedicate a whole team of full time people to work on it.Our storage phones home. It is smart and intelligent in that aspect, which has been huge for us. We don't have to be storage administrators.It is noticeably easier to manage than other appliances that we have.We have tons of capacity on it.It is fast and reliable. It works.

Read more »

The whole product is based on point-in-time restore capabilities built into their storage appliance, and no one else I know does that.The unit has been running at 100% without an issue.Any time I have needed anything, from a simple question to someone to be onsite, the customer service has been exceptional.The Reduxio unit is superior in its ability to recover from any second.It has a very intuitive interface, it integrates more smoothly with our steps. With a different product from a different manufacturer, there are a lot more steps required to set up a volume, to make it available in VMware and to utilize it there.We like the way the Reduxio is designed, the way the managing/operating end is just so much easier; fewer steps, more intuitive steps. It has a number of features baked into it that, in other products, are additional licensed components, like compression and dedupe.The biggest feature, and one of the reasons we use it with the file shares, is its continuous Snapshotting. We can go back to almost to any point in time, not only to last night at midnight or a week ago, but 10 minutes ago or three-hours-and-so-many-seconds, or whatever the case may be. We already had a brush with ransomware in the past, so it's good to know we can dial back to just before a mishap happens.It's very intuitive, has a very modern interface. Instead of making the user set up a million parameters for things that the system knows better anyway, they put all the intelligence in the product and made the controls much easier.

Read more »

Cons
We have not seen a reduction in our TCO nor have we seen ROI.We haven't seen ROI yet.I would like to see some improvements on the FlashBlade side around the CIFS space support. I am not super familiar with all the different NAS protocols that they run on their box, but there could be some improvements made on SMB CIFS side.We would like more extended historical data to help with some of the capacity planning. This is something that we are asking for all the time. E.g., what was the historical performance of this particular volume? So, we would like more historicals.We do have an issue with the vCenter integration. Pure Storage says it has a lot of free space, but vCenter says its completely full. This is because their dedupes are saved as space, but Vcenter still detects the disk as completely full. So, we do have an issue with that.The GUI is simplistic and basic. I feel like it's explanatory, but not enough, it needs a little more to it.I would love to see a true one click upgrade solution. Right now, you have to click and schedule an appointment with Pure Storage to be able to upgrade. I would love for it to automatically download, install, and fall-over every controller as it updates.What it needs to do is work a little closer with solutions, like VMware, so it understands the particular workloads that are on it. Today, it does not understand the applications which are running against it.

Read more »

The only critique that we have is it needs the ability to have local users added. You have to log in as one built-in admin account. You can't create your own.It would be helpful to have the ability to recover virtual machines individually without having to restore the full LUN.t would be helpful to have a mobile app to monitor the storage array remotely.Needs to be made easier to use with slightly older versions of VMware.The ability to look at data at a file level would be useful, as well as the ability recover at that level. Right now, you can only recover whole volumes.The only thing that I'd like to see, at some point in time, is having the storage array being able to detect a ransomware attack. When you get hit by a ransomware it rewrites every block in your guest's virtual machine. So there should be a way for them to be able to detect that: "Hey, this is unusual, to see every block of this guest being rewritten all at one time," and then flag that as potential malware or ransomware.Scalability is a little unusual. We came from the NetApp world where, if you needed more disk space, you just added more drives into the chassis, whereas with Reduxio, if you need more disk space, you have to buy a new chassis.the only thing I would say negative about Reduxio is the cabling was a little bit confusing at first, but now that we understand it, it's easy. It was just so different from what we've seen before. That was the only hard part to get used to. The storage array is fully redundant, so there are some cross-connect cables that you have to run, from the A side to the B side, and the B side back to the A side, and we've just never seen anything like that before. But now that I understand the design, it makes complete sense. But initially it was confusing.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
We have an Evergreen Storage subscription, which I think is a great feature.The licensing is $100,000.We have a seen a reduction in TCO. It is definitely a cost-effective solution for us. We have seen ROI.We have seen a reduction in total cost of ownership.It is cheaper than NetApp.There should be quite a bit of reduction of TCO with just licensing (and stuff) because we run the VM environment off it.The solution could be cheaper.The Evergreen Storage subscription is great, because then I get new controllers every three years.

Read more »

The licensing is very simple with Reduxio. It is actually one of the attractions, unlike some of the other products. The other product we're using, in some of its incarnations, has extremely complex pricing, with every spindle having an associated license and fees. With Reduxio it's very simple. For the box - the hardware comes in essentially one configuration for the chassis, the unit (and you can buy multiple units and daisy-chain them) - there is no "a-la-carte," so many drives of this kind or that kind, etc. It has a basic hardware configuration. Then, through the software license, they allocate or assign you the right to use the full capacity, or half of it, or a quarter of it. Of course, if you're not using the full capacity but need to, it is a simple phone call to upgrade. It's as simple as it gets.Set up costs are minimal. We were early adopters so we received really good pricing.I think that you are able to buy a minimum capacity, then grow your capacity within the box as you expand your data needs.ROI is how much (time, money, resources) you will save in case of a ransomware attack because you had this box.I think the pricing is good value, because you're not just buying a storage array, you're buying a backup solution and a DR solution and a "time machine" solution, all bundled in one storage array. When we had NetApp storage we had to then go out and buy a copy of Veeam which is a backup solution. With the Reduxio, you still need to do backups but you don't need that software product.You want the best, you've got to pay for the best, that's all. In terms of licensing, just work with your VAR. The features, overall, were just too good to pass up, even though it comes at a premium.Only one device is sold. Negotiate the initial storage, but you can start small and move up with ease. Negotiate.One of the key selling points of the Reduxio was that it really is fully licensed for the unit. There are no additional licenses needed for the product, which really helps scalability. There were no additional options to purchase, per se. They were already wrapped into the product.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which All-Flash Storage Arrays solutions are best for your needs.
348,558 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
3rd
Views
56,520
Comparisons
22,977
Reviews
72
Average Words per Review
458
Avg. Rating
9.2
6th
Views
6,342
Comparisons
1,093
Reviews
26
Average Words per Review
668
Avg. Rating
9.8
Top Comparisons
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Learn
Pure Storage
Reduxio
Overview

Pure Storage FlashArray is the world’s first enterprise-class, all-NVMe flash storage array. It represents a new class of storage – shared accelerated storage, that delivers major breakthroughs in performance, simplicity, and consolidation. Pure Storage is fresh and modern today and will be for the next decade. Without forklift upgrades or planned downtime, Pure takes the work out of storage ownership and delivers unprecedented customer satisfaction.

Reduxio's HX550 flash hybrid storage arrays, based on Reduxio's TimeOS storage operating system allow you to recover application data to any second in the past, eliminates most of the complexity associated with managing storage, and provides exceptional performance and efficiency, far exceeding anything available today.

Offer
Schedule Now

Schedule your free demo today!

Learn more about Reduxio
Sample Customers
Nielsen, Lamar Advertising, LinkedIn, Betfair, UT-DallasArray Networks, Barnstable Police Department, Catbird, Dingley Press, El Dorado County Office of Education, One Workplace
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm18%
Healthcare Company16%
Manufacturing Company9%
Government9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Healthcare Company12%
Government10%
Retailer9%
REVIEWERS
Museum Or Institution14%
Local Government14%
K 12 Educational Company Or School14%
University14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company22%
Marketing Services Firm17%
Government9%
Manufacturing Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise56%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise58%
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise41%
Large Enterprise24%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business54%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise23%
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage FlashArray vs. Reduxio and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
348,558 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all All-Flash Storage Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email