Compare Quality Center vs. Tricentis Tosca

Quality Center is ranked 5th in Test Management Tools with 11 reviews while Tricentis Tosca which is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 10 reviews. Quality Center is rated 8.2, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Quality Center writes "We can have multiple users execute tests independently on their own computers because the UFT scripts are stored online". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "I would recommend it to a team which does not have much reliance on technical testers but more with business testers". Quality Center is most compared with TFS, UFT (QTP) and IBM Rational Quality Manager, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with UFT (QTP), Selenium HQ and SmartBear TestComplete. See our Quality Center vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quality Center Logo
14,010 views|3,393 comparisons
Tricentis Tosca Logo
67,230 views|14,546 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Quality Center vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
360,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Ability to customize modules, particularly Defect Tracking module on company specific needsBy using QC we broke down silos (of teams), improved the organization of our tests, have a much better view of the testing status, and became much quicker in providing test results with document generation.The enhanced dashboards capabilities are useful for senior management to view the progress of releases under the portfolio in one go and also drill down to the graphs.By standardizing our template, we publish reports at the business unit level.I like the traceability, especially between requirements, testing, and defects.You can do your development from start to finish: starting with the requirements, ending with defects, and testing in-between.You can plan ahead with all the requirements and the test lab set it up as a library, then go do multiple testing times, recording the default that's in the system.Cross project customization through template really helps to maintain standards with respect to fields, workflows throughout the available projects.

Read more »

It has helped teams within our organization become more aware of the testing requirements in terms of risk and priority.Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people.We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis.We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation.Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications.Object Identification Wizard.Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies.Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface.

Read more »

Cons
The BPT also known as Business Process Testing can sometimes be very time intensive and sometimes might not be very intuitive to someone who is not familiar with BPT.We would like to have support for agile development.I would rate it a 10 if it had the template functionality on the web side, had better interfaces between other applications, so that we didn't have dual data entry or have to set up our own migrations.The downside is that the Quality Center's only been available on Windows for years, but not on Mac.It is nice, but it does have some weaknesses. It's a bit hard to go back and change the requirement tool after setup.Defect ageing reports need to be included as built-in.

Read more »

Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation.Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us.It needs better integration with JIRA.I would like a better user interface.Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability.The reporting function was lacking in usability and detail.Security, UI, and basic performance improvements could be done to the product to enhance its use.Running the regression – if multiple lists are executed at once or if a list contains 200+ tests, it’s a pain to stop the execution.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.I feel that the licenses are expensive. ​It has several limitations in adapting its agility easily.

Read more »

Tricentis Tosca may be relatively on the higher side in terms of pricing, but their sales rep can give pretty decent deals when asked.We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution.The pricing is high, but altogether it offers you the ability to automate all sorts of applications: desktop, web, mobile, etc.Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
360,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
5th
Views
14,010
Comparisons
3,393
Reviews
17
Average Words per Review
424
Avg. Rating
8.0
3rd
Views
67,230
Comparisons
14,546
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
371
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus Quality Center, HPE QC, HPE Quality Center
Learn
Micro Focus
Tricentis
Overview

Test more, test faster.

Eliminate poor quality releases and reduce the cost of rewriting applications with Micro Focus Quality Center.

Quality Center helps teams build and organize the testing effort, track progress throughout the application lifecycle, and is architected around testing best practices, asset fostering re-use. Teams can quickly build or import requirements and tests, execute enhanced manual testing, schedule and manage test-automation and manage defects throughout the lifecycle.

Tricentis Tosca specializes in enabling large enterprises to improve the quality of their applications by equipping them to optimize, manage, and automate their software testing.

Tosca's model-based approach to software test automation enables enterprises to achieve high automation rates while maximizing business risk coverage.

Tricentis Tosca also provides market-leading test case design and planning capabilities, test data provisioning, service virtualization, mobile testing, and more.

Tosca is fully compatible with other testing solutions and Application Lifecycle Management products. Tricentis also offers uniquely designed testing solutions for SAP, ServiceNow, Trax, Avaloq, and Oracle.

Offer
Learn more about Quality Center
Learn more about Tricentis Tosca
Sample Customers
Quality Center has over 5,000 customers including The Federal Administration, Bank Asya, CitiPower, Powercor, DB Systel, JetBlue, Seagate, Swiss Life, and NNE Pharmaplan. HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company17%
Financial Services Firm13%
Media Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company42%
Healthcare Company34%
Financial Services Firm13%
Government4%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Manufacturing Company12%
Insurance Company12%
Healthcare Company12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company22%
Financial Services Firm18%
Comms Service Provider12%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise64%
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise59%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise77%
Find out what your peers are saying about Quality Center vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
360,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email