Compare Quality Center vs. Tricentis Tosca

Quality Center is ranked 7th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Test Management Tools with 9 reviews. Quality Center is rated 9.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Quality Center writes "We can have multiple users execute tests independently on their own computers because the UFT scripts are stored online". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Having a regression suite that we can run gives us a high level of confidence in the changes we are making". Quality Center is most compared with TFS, UFT (QTP) and Performance Center, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with UFT (QTP), Selenium HQ and SmartBear TestComplete. See our Quality Center vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quality Center Logo
4,726 views|3,374 comparisons
Tricentis Tosca Logo
35,989 views|14,776 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Quality Center vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
383,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Ability to customize modules, particularly Defect Tracking module on company specific needsBy using QC we broke down silos (of teams), improved the organization of our tests, have a much better view of the testing status, and became much quicker in providing test results with document generation.The enhanced dashboards capabilities are useful for senior management to view the progress of releases under the portfolio in one go and also drill down to the graphs.By standardizing our template, we publish reports at the business unit level.

Read more »

This solution is easy to use for everybody, including those who are not IT-educated.The Model-Based Test Automation is the most valuable feature, where you can create reusable components. Even though we are using a scriptless automation tool, there still needs to be an understanding of how to create reusable components and how to keep refactoring and how to keep regression, the test scripts, at an okay level. We are coupling Tosca with some other risk-based testing tools, as well, but automation is primarily what we're using Tosca for, the scriptless, model-based technology which is driving automation for us.Tosca BI is important to make sure that our data integrity is in check and validated; to make sure our data is good. Our data is the number-one important driver for our company, so if that's not good, we have some big problems.The solution is script-less, so you don't need IT knowledge to use the solution in an operational way. This is the most valuable feature. It's also only one of two or three tools that can do good automation on SAP, and in my opinion, it's the best of those.It has helped teams within our organization become more aware of the testing requirements in terms of risk and priority.Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people.We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis.We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation.

Read more »

Cons
The BPT also known as Business Process Testing can sometimes be very time intensive and sometimes might not be very intuitive to someone who is not familiar with BPT.We would like to have support for agile development.

Read more »

I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories.There have been some setbacks because of upgrades. While Tosca has been around for a while, Tricentis has catered to smaller clients and I don't think they have done such a large, at-scale transition or transformation before or worked with a company like ours, which is doing an enterprise-wide transformation. When we go to their customer advisory-board meetings, upgrades have been an issue. They have been working a lot to make upgrades seamless.The main area where there is room for improvement is how they do upgrades. Going through this current upgrade, we were delayed a month because we are using a third-party tool. It's called Tosca Connect by Tasktop. When this latest upgrade broke that relationship between the two, it took Tricentis a month to come back with a workable solution... Their whole upgrade process needs to be better and cleaner, from an end-user standpoint.The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows.Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation.Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us.It needs better integration with JIRA.I would like a better user interface.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.I feel that the licenses are expensive. ‚ÄčIt has several limitations in adapting its agility easily.

Read more »

We have around 200 [concurrent] licenses and the cost around $1.4 million a year.Tricentis Tosca may be relatively on the higher side in terms of pricing, but their sales rep can give pretty decent deals when asked.We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
383,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
7th
Views
4,726
Comparisons
3,374
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
456
Avg. Rating
9.0
1st
Views
35,989
Comparisons
14,776
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
1,349
Avg. Rating
8.1
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus Quality Center, HPE QC, HPE Quality Center
Learn
Micro Focus
Tricentis
Overview

Test more, test faster.

Eliminate poor quality releases and reduce the cost of rewriting applications with Micro Focus Quality Center.

Quality Center helps teams build and organize the testing effort, track progress throughout the application lifecycle, and is architected around testing best practices, asset fostering re-use. Teams can quickly build or import requirements and tests, execute enhanced manual testing, schedule and manage test-automation and manage defects throughout the lifecycle.

Tricentis Tosca specializes in enabling large enterprises to improve the quality of their applications by equipping them to optimize, manage, and automate their software testing.

Tosca's model-based approach to software test automation enables enterprises to achieve high automation rates while maximizing business risk coverage.

Tricentis Tosca also provides market-leading test case design and planning capabilities, test data provisioning, service virtualization, mobile testing, and more.

Tosca is fully compatible with other testing solutions and Application Lifecycle Management products. Tricentis also offers uniquely designed testing solutions for SAP, ServiceNow, Trax, Avaloq, and Oracle.

Offer
Learn more about Quality Center
Learn more about Tricentis Tosca
Sample Customers
Quality Center has over 5,000 customers including The Federal Administration, Bank Asya, CitiPower, Powercor, DB Systel, JetBlue, Seagate, Swiss Life, and NNE Pharmaplan. HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company17%
Financial Services Firm13%
Media Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Healthcare Company22%
Software R&D Company22%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government11%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company15%
Manufacturing Company10%
Healthcare Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise64%
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise60%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise84%
Find out what your peers are saying about Quality Center vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
383,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email