We compared Qualys VMDR and Rapid7 InsightVM based on our users reviews in six parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
The setup process for Qualys VMDR was considered simple and quick, with users reporting it taking anywhere from a few minutes to a couple of days. However, there were some difficulties mentioned regarding integration and data privacy. Despite these challenges, the overall feedback on the setup was positive. On the other hand, the initial setup for Rapid7 InsightVM had mixed experiences. While some users found it easy and completed it within an hour or a few hours, others faced difficulties and it took them several months, even with professional assistance. The ease of setup was generally rated between three to five out of five.
Qualys VMDR is notable for its effective prioritization system, ongoing monitoring, adaptable dashboard, and extensive vulnerability overview. On the other hand, Rapid7 InsightVM stands out for its efficient scan engine installation, precise scanning, customizable dashboards, and risk scoring.
Both Qualys VMDR and Rapid7 InsightVM have areas that could be improved. Qualys VMDR could enhance user experience and UI design, improve SLA tracking and batch prioritization, integrate with other products, and improve reporting. On the other hand, Rapid7 InsightVM needs better integration, enhanced reporting, improved user-friendliness, and stronger customer support.
The cost of setting up Qualys VMDR can differ based on required features, with reviewers finding it reasonably priced or competitive. However, there are extra charges for specific features. In contrast, Rapid7 InsightVM is generally considered to be more expensive, but some users find the pricing reasonable because of the flexibility in defining assets and sites.
Qualys VMDR is praised for its positive impact on ROI, effectively mitigating risks and enhancing cybersecurity. Nonetheless, there are apprehensions regarding rising expenses. On the other hand, Rapid7 InsightVM is highly regarded for its outstanding ROI, effectively thwarting cyber attacks and delivering substantial value. While some reviewers perceive the ROI as satisfactory, others consider it to be moderate.
The customer service for Qualys VMDR has received both positive and negative feedback. Some customers appreciate the convenience of accessing a global team and the implementation of suggested improvements. However, there are concerns about the response time and the expertise of the support personnel. In contrast, Rapid7 InsightVM's support is generally regarded as good, with well-informed technical assistance. Nonetheless, there have been instances of delayed response time.
Comparison Results
Based on the reviews, Qualys VMDR offers a simple and convenient setup process, along with a strong prioritization system and valuable features. However, it requires enhancements in user experience, integration, reporting, and pricing. On the other hand, Rapid7 InsightVM also provides an easy setup, valuable features like scan engines and customizable dashboards. It could benefit from improved integration, reporting, user-friendliness, and customer support. Qualys VMDR seems to have an advantage in prioritization and comprehensive vulnerability management, while Rapid7 InsightVM may excel in scan optimization and remediation management.
"I am impressed with the VMDR feature."
"What I like about Qualys VM is the dashboard presentation. It's very good."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution is very lightweight."
"It is very easy to use and there are lots of options. We can usually easily go through it and all of the things we want to configure, and we can configure everything to our specifications very easily."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to run different capabilities with the same agent. With only one agent, we can have EDR, vulnerability management, compliance and some basic SaaS security capabilities."
"The vulnerability management feature is what I used the most. It is a good SaaS product. It is easy to use. It has a nice UI where you can see all the assets and vulnerabilities."
"Technical support is fantastic."
"The solution shows us classic categories, including high, medium, and low risks. It also shows critical items, and that gives us the advantage of prioritizing things."
"The most valuable feature is the site scanning, where we can provide a complete subnet and what it is we need to scan on those devices."
"Has great reporting features."
"The cost is what is most valuable. Compared to the other products on the market, the cost is more palatable."
"The most valuable features are its reporting capabilities and the host discovery functionality."
"The assessment is most valuable."
"The product is scalable."
"The performance is good."
"The solution is automatically scheduled so it runs by itself."
"Qualys VMDR is basically susceptible to false positives, and false negatives."
"Qualys VM should improve its methodology."
"Qualys currently does not have any features for scanning SCADA, IoT, and Industrial Control Systems."
"Qualys does have an on-prem solution, but it is very expensive."
"Sometimes we face a problem with accessing the tool and not getting an expected result. From a technology point of view, they need to look into this."
"Could use additional security for the app."
"Make some minimal dashboard improvements."
"The reporting and the GUI need improvements."
"The reporting is a little bit tricky because it can be difficult to exactly pinpoint some of the assets to filter them and generate a report."
"There was functionality present previously, however, currently, we can't integrate directly with Jira Service Desk - only the cloud version."
"InsightVM could be improved by providing passive scanning as an option."
"In order to be able to properly test the solution and make a decision, I would like to receive the test license code instantly and eliminate the wait time."
"It would be nice to have an additional feature that would provide reports on who has logged onto the console or who did what on the console."
"We are a registered reseller and a trusted partner. However, for us to get any support from them I can't log a call directly with Rapid7 InsightVM. I have to work with the distributor to log the call for me."
"They should integrate the solution with multiple products."
"There have been instances where technical support takes a long time to update the status of a ticket, which is something that can be improved."
Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews while Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, whereas Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Rapid7 InsightIDR and Wiz. See our Qualys VMDR vs. Rapid7 InsightVM report.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.