We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightVM and Skyhigh Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The reports in Rapid7 InsightVM are useful when compared to competitors."
"I have been in contact with technical support and they are not bad."
"I rate InsightVM eight out of 10 for ease of setup. It takes two or three engineers to deploy. The solution requires some maintenance. It's mainly cleaning up data."
"NeXpose is a pretty good vulnerability scanner... There's a nice dashboard."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"The ease of deployment and configuration allows users to onboard quickly."
"InsightVM's most valuable feature is risk scoring, a formula based on different vectors like the ease of exploitation and the availability of the machine."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Skyhigh has given us categorization and rating of websites separate from what the web proxy places on the logs."
"It gives us visibility into how the data is being used within our cloud environment."
"The risk rating of each cloud application has been very useful. Whenever we discover a new application is use, we are able to quickly determine if this application is safe to use and whether or not we should allow our end users to be able to access it."
"What's most valuable in Skyhigh Security is its level of security. Another valuable feature of the solution is threat analysis."
"The management is very good."
"There is [a feature] called cloud registry where we can see a risk assessment for the cloud services being used. If we want to add a new cloud service or a new cloud application, we can check into it and do an assessment through the cloud registry."
"It is easy to configure rules."
"In terms of their compatibility with major cloud providers, in terms of their abilities, capabilities, and features, they exceed everyone's capabilities in the CASB market."
"The authentication scan is not working."
"We'd like the agent to cover more compliance issues."
"There is a significant learning curve, that non-technical individuals, especially those not specialized in computer science or the information security industry, might face."
"There is room for improvement on its cloud side. In the next release I would like to see better reporting."
"There are not enough templates, and the reporting is weak with this solution."
"Rapid7 InsightVM could be easier to use for those who are using it for the first time."
"All products have room for increased security and Rapid7 InsightVM is no exception."
"There have been instances where technical support takes a long time to update the status of a ticket, which is something that can be improved."
"The tool could improve flexibility with the creation of reports/querying data."
"Though the Skyhigh Dashboard is processing large amounts of data, the speed of the Dashboard could be improved."
"I think that the User Interface could be improved."
"Skyhigh Security, as a product, is excellent, but in terms of the right services and support, those are lagging very much, for example, in Trellix. From one hundred, its score has gone down to ten, so ten out of one hundred, otherwise, it's the number one product."
"The services take some time to load. It would be helpful if the loading time was reduced."
"Its initial setup could be more straightforward."
"McAfee Web Gateway could improve the reporting. We have the reporting on a separate server and sometimes the database becomes full. These aspects could improve."
"One area for improvement I've seen in Skyhigh Security is that it lacks support for unsanctioned applications, where customers have their applications. Those applications do not come from Microsoft or other popular vendors. For example, Microsoft has support for Teams and it has support for OneDrive, but it doesn't have support for custom applications built by customers. Customers have internal teams building and publishing applications to the external world, but Skyhigh Security doesn't have support for those applications, and this is the main problem I've seen. The solution only supports a pool of applications that are from Microsoft and other major SaaS vendors. McAfee doesn't provide support for custom applications, compared to other vendors who provide it. For example, Bitglass and Netskope both have support for custom applications. Another area for improvement in Skyhigh Security is that its API support is a little weak. I also have not seen a strong integration between the solution and other McAfee products."
Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews while Skyhigh Security is ranked 7th in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 51 reviews. Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0, while Skyhigh Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Skyhigh Security writes "Good scalability, but the technical support service needs improvement". Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Rapid7 InsightIDR, whereas Skyhigh Security is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Netskope , Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Symantec Proxy and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.