We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightVM and XM Cyber based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The product's initial setup phase was very easy."
"The solution works well."
"It is good and fits well with pretty much all of our use case needs."
"Rapid7 InsightVM has given us a practical view of the vulnerabilities present in our organization."
"Has great reporting features."
"The remediation project is a pretty effective because it allows us, as clients or countries, to choose specific assets and set limitations on them for a certain period which allows us to track and follow up on those limitations. However, when it comes to real-time monitoring and live dashboards, InsightVM doesn't quite fit the bill. It's not a real-time solution and is not instant."
"The most valuable feature for us is the different types of reporting it provides."
"We can create our own templates."
"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."
"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."
"The reporting has room for improvement. You cannot customize any report. If I need a specific requirement, I have to create a new report for it."
"InsightVM could be improved by providing passive scanning as an option."
"Some difficulties with the online reporting and lack of integrations."
"A definite improvement would be to make it easier to run ad-hoc scans without needing to assign the asset to a site or group."
"This solution integrates with another module in Metasploit, that doesn't exist in the other solutions. It is subscribed to on our roadmap, but we chose to implement both Nexppose and AppSpider."
"There are not enough templates, and the reporting is weak with this solution."
"The authentication scan is not working."
"There are end-user needs and expectations that are being overlooked in the development that could be addressed by appointing a customer advisory board."
"We'd like to see a cheaper price."
"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas."
Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews while XM Cyber is ranked 26th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 2 reviews. Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0, while XM Cyber is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XM Cyber writes "Reliable with no false-positives and helpful support". Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Rapid7 InsightIDR, whereas XM Cyber is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, Picus Security and AttackIQ.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.