We performed a comparison between Salt Security and Skybox Security Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Noname Security, Salt Security, F5 and others in API Security."It's really great. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. I haven't encountered any instability issues."
"instead of asking for firewall rules which may or may not be relevant, or could already be there, or could be over-permissioned, Skybox can be used to map out the resources that that application is going to use and provide the exact rules that an application would require to function correctly. If the traffic isn't able to flow for the application, if it's erring out, Skybox can be used to troubleshoot that and say, "All right, where is the traffic being stopped and why, and how do I fix that.""
"Aside from Firewall Assurance, we are using Network Assurance and Change Manager for an overview of the whole network and for documenting requests and the recertification of the ruleset."
"The solution offers very nice dashboards and they've recently added a very good Java-based web interface."
"The solution's most valuable and unique assets are the vulnerability management and change management solutions because they identify mistakes in the network before implementation which reduces risks."
"Skybox allows organizations to reprioritize the vulnerability they attempt to patch and mitigate, based on the contextual awareness of the network."
"I am impressed with the tool's change management, firewall and network assurance."
"The port division management was the solution's most valuable aspect for our organization."
"Skybox deployment is simple, and it's very useful."
"The integration part could be a bit extended."
"The Network Assurance, which helps to create the network model, is not so rich."
"The tool does not offer options for customization."
"The cloud site could be better. They should provide some use cases to help users."
"It's expensive."
"The most recent update was not tested with all of the vendors before it was released, so some of the features are misbehaving."
"Skybox Security Suite's attack surface management feature needs improvement."
"The only place where Skybox has room for improvement, and they're working on releasing this, it's just a slow-go, is the UI. The user interface has historically been via a locally installed thick client. They are moving to a web-based console and it's slowly coming out."
"Skybox should improve their UX features by making them easier to use."
Salt Security is ranked 2nd in API Security with 1 review while Skybox Security Suite is ranked 18th in Vulnerability Management with 34 reviews. Salt Security is rated 0.0, while Skybox Security Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Salt Security writes "Provides visibility and control over all APIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Skybox Security Suite writes "Efficient in vulnerability management, stable and easy to use ". Salt Security is most compared with Noname Security, Wallarm NG WAF, Traceable AI, Orca Security and 42Crunch API Security Platform, whereas Skybox Security Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, FireMon Security Manager, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Rapid7 InsightVM.
We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.