ChrichtianNealIT Officer at a tech services company
JohannesJoubertBusiness Solutions Architect at a real estate/law firm
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The actual interface is good."
"It is one of the most stable relational databases out there."
"The most valuable feature is replication because we had several replicas of the SQL Server database in different geographical locations."
"The availability is the most valuable feature. It has high availability. It also has good performance."
"SQL is very easy to manage."
"It helps with moving the design of the database into reality."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that it is easy to code."
"Very good security features."
"The features that we have found the most valuable are reliability, availability perspective, and current scalability."
"Because the solution is customized. we do occasionally face unique bugs. There are always some changes that need to be made here and there."
"I would like to see native plugins built for other platforms versus having to buy third-party plugins to tap into S3 buckets and AWS Cloud. Right now, it does not have those built-in plugins."
"I would like to have more replication scenarios."
"In terms of improvement, it could use more integration with other products."
"Occasionally the performance, as good as it is, is a bit off. We sometimes experience memory spiking. If they could maybe fix that aspect of the solution, that would be quite helpful for our organization."
"The product overall would benefit from the addition of better tutorials to help master the skills necessary to actually build a project database. Right now, what is available isn't sufficient."
"In terms of what could be improved, everything on-premise is now moving to the cloud. Obviously SQL Server has also moved, because Microsoft Excel has its own cloud called Azure Finance. Every solution comes with its own advantages and disadvantages."
"Query optimitzer could be simplified."
"The scalability and the high availability feature can be expanded or improved. Currently, there is a limitation on scalability. A feature similar to the Oracle Diagnostic feature can be included to provide a better user experience."
"It is expensive, but you get what you pay for."
"Since we are a cloud-based company, there is AWS pricing on top of the SQL Server pricing. The Enterprise Edition can typically sell from around $1000 dollars a month, which is not cheap. Then, there is an additional one-time Windows cost, based on the code, which can go anywhere from $30,000 to $40,000 for the license."
"SQL Server is a cost-effective solution for a small database."
"Pricing is reasonable for small organizations, but the scaling increases the price."
"We didn't have any licensing costs for SQL Server."
"We pay approximately $12,000 USD per month for both the server and the license."
"The price could be cheaper."
"Cost is a major derivative for any organization. It has a reasonable cost value, and its cloud support is also better than others. Comparatively, Oracle can do the same things or is even better in certain areas, but it is expensive. The cost along with the support are the plus factors for SQL Server."
Earn 20 points
With SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (SAP ASE), you can handle massive volumes of data and thousands of concurrent users to accelerate the growth of new data-driven business applications. Drive value with a faster, more efficient transactional system that is designed to meet the demands of the digital economy.
SQL Server is the Microsoft-driven relational database management system. This system is used to store data as well as retrieve it when necessary; these functions can be supported by individual users or by multiple users within a larger network. The Microsoft SQL Server has warehousing options, quality and integration services, management tools that are simple to implement, as well as robust tools for development.
Looking at the more technical end of things, Microsoft SQL Server uses query languages such as T-SQL and ANSI SQL. Disaster recovery is one of the product's most prominent features, in addition to in-memory performance, scalability, and corporate business intelligence capabilities.
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is ranked 13th in Relational Databases with 1 review while SQL Server is ranked 1st in Relational Databases with 36 reviews. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is rated 9.0, while SQL Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise writes "A completely customized solution that's stable and offers excellent technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Server writes "A stable, scalable, and easy-to-deploy solution that pretty much covers everything". SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is most compared with SAP HANA, SAP IQ, Oracle Database, SAP SQL Anywhere and IBM Db2 Database, whereas SQL Server is most compared with SAP HANA, Oracle Database, Teradata, IBM Db2 Database and MariaDB.
See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.