DocuSign CLM vs SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
  • More SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Contract Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The integration capabilities of the product are pretty good.
    Top Answer:The prices can vary depending on the customer, region, and domain. I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price.
    Top Answer:The product's user interface is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required. The tool could be made a bit more… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    696
    Comparisons
    625
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    325
    Comparisons
    283
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    725
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management by OpenText, SAP Extended ECM
    Learn More
    Overview
    SpringCM's platform manages contracts, documents and all types of content. SpringCM includes powerful workflow, mobile and security features that eliminate time-consuming manual steps in critical business processes.

    A digital core built on the SAP HANA business data platform and integrated applications for content management comprise the next-generation business model to complete your digital transformation and help you manage unstructured content as part of the business transactions more effectively while facilitating collaboration and storing content to avoid redundancies, minimize information growth, and support regulatory compliance. The SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management application by OpenText helps you engage customers with a 360-degree view of their profile and optimize procurement processes, employee productivity, process efficiency, and equipment ROI.

    Sample Customers
    Valvoline, Uber, Spotify, Popsugar, Facebook, NCR, USDA, US Department of Energy, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
    Metropolitan Utilities District, MAN Diesel & Turbo
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    No Data Available

    DocuSign CLM is ranked 2nd in Contract Management Software while SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is ranked 14th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review. DocuSign CLM is rated 9.0, while SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of DocuSign CLM writes "Our contracts are moving from draft to full authorization significantly faster now". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management writes "A stable tool with good integration capabilities". DocuSign CLM is most compared with DocuSign Gen, Determine Contract Lifecycle Management, Icertis Contract Management, SirionLabs and Apttus, whereas SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is most compared with Adobe Experience Manager and IBM ECM.

    We monitor all Contract Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.