We performed a comparison between IBM ECM and SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."The vertical scalability, as we can use it across some of our applications."
"The tool is a very stable solution with high availability and no information leakage. It has built-in API integration on-site. You can integrate with other components and applications like SAP, Microsoft, Oracle, etc."
"The content management is all about you as you can make the same content for minimal purpose solutions applications."
"The scalability is a valuable feature, that we're able to display our documents to so many people."
"The integration capabilities of the product are pretty good."
"I would like to see seamless application integration."
"The development platform is not local. For example, you need 100 days in IBM, whereas other platforms, like ServiceNow, need only 20 days."
"I think it's already getting away from Java applets. A lot of our users struggle with keeping up to date with Java versioning, so a lot of the functions they're doing, like printing, emailing, and even some of the viewing, they're struggling with."
"I would recommend not going with ECM 8 and going with FileNet instead. It seems like that is the future of the lower-volume repository. It seems like they are moving away from ECM 8.5 so I think we're going to have some challenges coming up, getting off of that technology."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
More SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM ECM is ranked 13th in Enterprise Content Management with 16 reviews while SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is ranked 14th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review. IBM ECM is rated 8.0, while SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM ECM writes "Datacap provides granularity and any level of customization. Solution development and delivery time needs to be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management writes "A stable tool with good integration capabilities". IBM ECM is most compared with IBM FileNet, Mobius Content Services Platform, OpenText Documentum, Alfresco and Hyland OnBase, whereas SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is most compared with Adobe Experience Manager.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
