We compared SentinelOne Singularity Complete and ThreatLocker Protect based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Based on user reviews, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and ThreatLocker Protect both have strengths in advanced threat detection and customer support. However, while SentinelOne's focus is on comprehensive protection and ease of use, ThreatLocker excels in providing granular control and visibility over file activities. SentinelOne users appreciate the platform's AI technology and user-friendly interface, while ThreatLocker users value its seamless integration with existing systems and effectiveness in preventing unauthorized access. Overall, both products have received positive feedback from users, with SentinelOne standing out for its proactive security measures and ThreatLocker for its granular control features.
Features: SentinelOne Singularity Complete stands out with its comprehensive threat detection, advanced AI, intuitive interface, and swift response to emerging threats. In contrast, ThreatLocker Protect offers advanced threat detection, seamless integration, ease of use, reliable blocking, granular control, and visibility over file activities.
Pricing and ROI: SentinelOne Singularity Complete and ThreatLocker Protect differ in terms of setup cost. Users have expressed their perspectives on the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of both products. While customers have shared insights about the cost-effectiveness and ease of setting up ThreatLocker Protect, opinions on the setup cost of SentinelOne Singularity Complete are also available., The ROI for SentinelOne Singularity Complete is driven by its comprehensive protection, real-time threat detection, and proactive security measures, while ThreatLocker Protect offers significant value and returns by enhancing security, preventing threats, and minimizing potential damages.
Room for Improvement: Users have provided feedback on SentinelOne Singularity Complete that highlights the need for improvements in system performance, user interface, customization options, reporting capabilities, and integration with other security solutions. On the other hand, for ThreatLocker Protect, user feedback specifically focuses on identifying the product's drawbacks.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews for SentinelOne Singularity Complete indicate that the timeframe for deployment and setup are generally the same and should be considered together. However, the user reviews for ThreatLocker Protect highlight the variability in the time required for deployment, setup, and implementation phases., Customer service for SentinelOne Singularity Complete has been positively praised for its prompt and helpful assistance, as well as reliable and efficient support staff. On the other hand, ThreatLocker Protect's customer service also receives high praise for its prompt and helpful assistance, knowledgeable and efficient support team, and commitment to customer satisfaction.
The summary above is based on 148 interviews we conducted recently with SentinelOne Singularity Complete and ThreatLocker Protect users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The stability is very good."
"The most valuable feature is the quick response to attacks."
"I appreciate that it is easy to review incidents that have been detected by the behavioral AI or the SentinelOne Cloud."
"SentinelOne Singularity Complete, together with SentinelOne Vigilance, is an EDR tool with capabilities such as these, which I found valuable: the dashboard that shows you all the information and the power to either manually or automatically quarantine issues or threats in the environment."
"The best thing SentinelOne has done for us is that it gives us insight into the endpoints. We never had insight into lateral movement threats before. Once a threat known as Qbot gets on the network, it actually spreads throughout sub-networks quickly. SentinelOne has detected that and saved our bacon. We were able to get in there and stop the threat, lock it down, and prevent it from actually spreading through. It would have been 50 or 60 computers. It had spread through in a few minutes. We have a lot of HIPAA data and FERPA data that we need to keep protected."
"Their platform is really easy to work with."
"They provide a map, a process tree, and that is pretty good for analysis."
"The overall product quality is good."
"SentinelOne is preferred because of its great features and nominal cost."
"Every single feature has been invaluable."
"The great thing is that if you get a malicious email and you try to run something, ThreatLocker is not going to let it do anything. It is not going to let anything infect your network."
"The biggest improvement has been knowing that something unauthorized isn't going to get installed on anyone’s machines."
"The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need."
"While it can be frustrating at times, we appreciate the low-level security provided by the application whitelist."
"Application control, ring-fencing, and storage control are the most important features, followed closely by elevation."
"Feature-wise, the learning mode and the fact that it's blocking everything are the most valuable. I don't see why more companies don't use the type of product."
"ThreatLocker Allowlisting has all of these features integrated into one console, making it effective."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"SentinelOne's customer service has room for improvement."
"I don't like switching the way you switch from legacy to XDR."
"It primarily operates on local machines, monitoring processes, and not always providing detailed insights, relying on external information to determine the nature of a file."
"There aren't enough reporting capabilities for decision-makers."
"I'd like to see more documentation."
"The MDM functionality and maturity still need improvement."
"The ability to integrate this product with an antivirus solution would be welcome. Even consolidation with more security products, like Umbrella networking abilities etc. to provide more on this platform, that would be great."
"SentinelOne needs to improve its endpoint deployment process."
"If you have a thousand computers with ThreatLocker agents on them, when you approve or create a new policy saying that Adobe Reader that matches this hashtag and meets certain criteria is allowed to be installed, it applies at the top level or the organization level. It applies to every computer in the company. When you make that new policy and push it out and it goes out and updates all of the clients. Unfortunately, at this time, it does not look like they stagger the push-out."
"The snapshots used in the ThreatLocker University portal are outdated snippets and have not been updated in conjunction with the portal itself."
"From a reporting perspective, enhancing the ability to customize reports would be beneficial."
"The reporting could be improved."
"Adding applications to the allowlist can sometimes feel overwhelming."
"One area I see for improvement is in the visibility of support tickets within the ThreatLocker ticketing system."
"Something we have come up against a couple of times is that we have two clients that are software developers. They create software that doesn't have digital signatures and that's not easy to categorize or whitelist with ThreatLocker. We have to go in and make custom rules to allow them to do their work and to be protected from malicious threats."
"We identified several areas that we would like to see improved."
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 176 reviews while ThreatLocker Protect is ranked 22nd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 13 reviews. SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8, while ThreatLocker Protect is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatLocker Protect writes "Integration is simple, deployment is straightforward, and extensive well-written documentation is available online". SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, whereas ThreatLocker Protect is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, GravityZone Business Security, Huntress and Fortinet FortiClient. See our SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. ThreatLocker Protect report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
