Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] vs Trustwave DbProtect comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
McAfee Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Trustwave Logo
1,134 views|503 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] and Trustwave DbProtect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Imperva, Oracle and others in Database Security.
To learn more, read our detailed Database Security Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has the ability to stop any violation coming through via the database."

More Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] Pros →

"Transfer and vulnerability scanning are the most valuable features of this product.""The most valuable feature of the solution is that you can have a good view which is provided with a proper division of all your databases, which you can see in Trustwave DbProtect.""This solution helps our clients to monitor their database use, and detect violations of the policy."

More Trustwave DbProtect Pros →

Cons
"It needs to detect more attacks and do more profiling of the database to learn its normal behaviors to sense violations."

More Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] Cons →

"The product does not have encryption or data masking.""We have not been able to integrate this product with a lot of standard incident response solutions, so an open API would help in this regard.""I have seen that the tool's installation phase has some problems regarding the versions, specifically the version of SQL."

More Trustwave DbProtect Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The licensing fees, including support, are approximately $5,000 USD per database, per year."
  • "I rate the pricing a five on a scale from one to ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest."
  • More Trustwave DbProtect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Security solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution is that you can have a good view which is provided with a proper division of all your databases, which you can see in Trustwave DbProtect.
    Top Answer:Price-wise, Trustwave DbProtect falls in the mid-range category in Portugal. Many solutions similar to Trustwave DbProtect are expensive in the market. I rate the pricing a five on a scale from one to… more »
    Top Answer:I have seen that the tool's installation phase has some problems regarding the versions, specifically the version of SQL. Trustwave DbProtect doesn't accept some versions of SQL. Some credentials when… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Database Security
    4th
    out of 22 in Database Security
    Views
    1,134
    Comparisons
    503
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    648
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Application Security DbProtect
    Learn More
    Overview
    McAfee database security offers real-time protection for business-critical databases from all types of threats: external, internal, and even intra-database exploits. This software-based offering provides robust security, streamlined database security management, and continuous compliance without requiring architecture changes, costly hardware, or downtime.

    Trustwave DbProtect is a security platform designed for consistent monitoring and management of enterprise databases within the data center.

    Built on a centrally managed and distributed architecture, DbProtect uncovers database weaknesses. This includes configuration mistakes, identification and access control issues, missing patches, or any toxic combination of settings that could lead to escalation of privileges attacks, data leakage, denial-of-service (DoS), or unauthorized modification of data held within data stores – both relational databases and big data stores.

    Sample Customers
    Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (TTUHSC)
    Pax World Investments, Crest Savings Bank, Magnolia Hotels
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government22%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Database Security
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Imperva, Oracle and others in Database Security. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Database Security while Trustwave DbProtect is ranked 4th in Database Security with 6 reviews. Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Trustwave DbProtect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] writes "It has the ability to stop any violation coming through via the database, but it should be able to detect more attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trustwave DbProtect writes "A tool that offers a proper view and division of all databases while also allowing users to do continuous monitoring". Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Trustwave DbProtect is most compared with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, Oracle Audit Vault, IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and Trustwave AppDetectivePRO.

    See our list of best Database Security vendors.

    We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.