We performed a comparison between SmartBear TestComplete Mobile and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Mobile App Testing Tools."The features I find most valuable is the automatic remapping of aliases, because it is really helpful."
"I like that it offers internal methods for supported controls. It is very easy to code the tests. Object Spy is also a good feature."
"The product enables codeless automation."
"The use of automation is most valuable."
"The low code is the best feature."
"One notable feature is its ability to handle negative XPath healing processes. If one XPath fails, Tosca can utilize backup XPaths to ensure test cases do not fail due to locator issues, thereby focusing on identifying application-side issues, which is the ultimate goal."
"What I find valuable is that Tricentis is always refining the test methodology. They listen to feedback from the analysts about what the testing tool should do, and then Tricentis always implements it. So all the necessary testing functions are already implemented in their tools."
"The most valuable features of Tricentis Tosca are all the test automation functionality. It is a full-scale automation tool."
"The most valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca is the Tosca Commander. Functionality is another thing I find most valuable in the solution."
"Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface."
"It is very difficult to use the aliases on old software."
"The mapping is pretty complicated because there are a lot of controls that are the same and if you have a long name with the object mapping it is easy to get confused."
"More and more artificial intelligence (AI) is coming in. So, some amount of AI to create natural language processing (NLP)-based test cases and manage defects would be very helpful. This is because the technologies have evolved in the last five to six months, so there is a potential opportunity there."
"The user management could improve in Tricentis Tosca because it is confusing. It would be better to have it in one place. Having to add it to the cloud and to a specific project can be a mess."
"ScratchBook execution needs to be improved as Tosca crashes multiple times."
"First, Tricentis could improve Tosca's Linux scripting. We can automate Linux scripting, but there are a few commands that Tosca doesn't support. DVS support and the object identification mechanism could also be better."
"The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows."
"I have found that some of the functions could be missed in the solution for new users. They are not obviously present."
"The UI does not have the option of automating the scroll bars."
"Very difficult to get information about licensing costs."
Earn 20 points
SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is ranked 14th in Mobile App Testing Tools while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Mobile App Testing Tools with 96 reviews. SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is rated 8.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete Mobile writes "We are facing sometimes the situation when we have some issues with our automated tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". SmartBear TestComplete Mobile is most compared with , whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, Worksoft Certify, Postman and SmartBear TestComplete.
See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
