Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection vs SonicWall Email Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection and SonicWall Email Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP).
To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has a dynamic runtime engine, which gives it an advantage over Prisma that has a static engine. In Prisma, we have to do additional malware analysis, which is not required in Proofpoint."

More Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection Pros →

"Beside a few issues with specificity in the email protection controls, this product is very good at handling email security.""This solution provides very good email security that protects us against spamming and malware.""The product is easy to manage in terms of configurations.""The most valuable feature is that it protects from spam.""The anti-spam aspect of the solution is its most valuable feature.""There are no wasted extras and the interface is really simple.""The most valuable feature of SonicWall Email Security is the blocking of emails using keywords. If there are any particular keywords in the subject, that we want to block from receiving from a particular person we can do it. Additionally, the blocking of emails is easy. we can release that one and we can block some of the keywords also like that.""According to our customers, the product's most valuable feature is the ability to detect spam and reduce phishing emails."

More SonicWall Email Security Pros →

Cons
"We are using the TRAP console that has a Linux-based UI, which is not user-friendly. The TAP console looks very advanced. Currently, we are maintaining three different consoles, and it is sometimes hard to switch between them or try to grab the data."

More Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection Cons →

"The technical support from the company is not always very good at solving issues, but they offer access to a good community of users where problems are easily solved.""A lot of spoofed emails are still coming to the end-user, so the configuration for this option needs to be improved.""Updates could be released more frequently.""The protection level for email security isn't 100%. I'm still getting some spam and junk mail.""The platform's control panel needs enhancement.""The reporting needs improvement.""SonicWall Email Security could improve by making the file blocking and the release feature easier to use""We would like to see more information on a dashboard about what is happening when it comes to spamming and malware."

More SonicWall Email Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We have a two-year license subscription and the price is very high."
  • "When compared with Cisco, it is very well priced. Cisco is very expensive."
  • "The overall price of SonicWall Email Security should be reduced and there should be an option to purchase one or two licenses more instead of their current policy of bulk increases only. There should be more flexibility in the licensing model. Each license cost approximately $33 annually."
  • "The cost is cheaper than Sophos. I would rate it as five out of ten."
  • "Our customers purchase the solution's yearly license."
  • "I rate the application’s pricing a five out of ten."
  • "The platform offers a yearly license."
  • More SonicWall Email Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:According to our customers, the product's most valuable feature is the ability to detect spam and reduce phishing emails.
    Top Answer:The platform offers a yearly license. I charge additionally for deployment services. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
    Top Answer:The platform's control panel needs enhancement. At present, many control options are allotted to individual users. It becomes difficult for them to manage and handle the panel. Thus, they could be… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    814
    Comparisons
    606
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    19th
    out of 107 in Email Security
    Views
    542
    Comparisons
    396
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    319
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Targeted Attack Protection
    Dell SonicWALL Email Security Platform, SonicWall Hosted Email Security
    Learn More
    Overview

    More than 90% of targeted attacks start with email—and these threats are always evolving. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) helps you stay ahead of attackers with an innovative approach that detects, analyzes and blocks advanced threats before they reach your inbox. This includes ransomware and other advanced email threats delivered through malicious attachments and URLs. And zero-day threats, polymorphic malware, weaponized documents and phishing attacks. TAP provides adaptive controls to isolate the riskiest URL clicks. TAP also detects threats and risks in cloud apps, connecting email attacks related to credential theft or other attacks.

    SonicWALL Email Security Platform offers powerful protection to keep email threats out. And sensitive data in. With innovative protection techniques for both inbound and outbound email plus unique management tools, the Email Security platform delivers superior email protection today while standing ready to stop the new attacks of tomorrow.
    Sample Customers
    Brinker Capital
    Star Kay White, Locala Community Partnerships
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Non Tech Company25%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Printing Company13%
    Maritime Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Construction Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business71%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise41%
    Buyer's Guide
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: April 2024.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is ranked 23rd in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) while SonicWall Email Security is ranked 19th in Email Security with 12 reviews. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is rated 7.0, while SonicWall Email Security is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection writes "Dynamic runtime engine and good protection, but needs better support and a single console". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonicWall Email Security writes "Effective threat prevention, reliable, and beneficial keyword blocking". Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Avanan, IRONSCALES, Palo Alto Networks WildFire and Microsoft Defender for Identity, whereas SonicWall Email Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Fortinet FortiMail, Barracuda Email Security Gateway, Sophos Email and Fortinet FortiMail Cloud.

    We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.