We use professional implementation services to deploy F5 BIG-IP LTM.

View full review »

We implemented in-house. 

View full review »

We have a managed service provider, and they hired a consultant. We had some help there, but that was not just because of LPM. We also had other modules of F5. It was our initial or first experience with F5, and there were also other things to be migrated, which were much more complex than the LPM module. That's why the consultant was there.

For deployment, there was one person deploying it. For maintenance, we have a managed service provider. So, we have a team of people, but they're also looking at other devices and not just F5.

View full review »

For complex issues we generally take a consultation from the F5, however, for the standard or medium standard application, we do it on our own. For the SharePoint migration using the complex i-rule, we took a consultation from F5.

View full review »

One person is enough for the deployment process. 

Maintenance is not that difficult, but compared to Kemp, it is. Upgrading can be challenging; I faced issues with F5 upgrades, needed support assistance.

View full review »

We installed the solution in a web-based environment and have implemented it in two data centers, one located in New Jersey and the other in a different location. We have used F5 for both firewall load balancing and link load balancing. We have two sets of F5 deployed at each location. 

We completed the installation within a week with the help of a team of five people. At present, a team of five is managing and maintaining the solution in the data center and for the local portion.

View full review »

The product is deployed on-premise.

View full review »

The deployments were primarily done in-house. I would basically order and buy it. I would come up with the architectural designs for the network, work with some of the web server folks and some of the server people, and we would come up with a list of what was needed, which was usually thousands of things. Then, I would just develop an architectural model that would use the products.

View full review »

We did not do the implementation ourselves.

View full review »

We used a consultant to deploy F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM).

View full review »

We do not use third-party vendors. Everything is completed in-house.

This solution is managed by two network engineers, myself, and a colleague.

View full review »

We haven't had any issues with the integration and configuration of AWS. It works just like it would on-premise. I have some questions around its scale in the cloud. We haven't done as much work in the cloud as we've done with on-premise. However, so far we haven't had any problems with it either.

View full review »

I handled the installation myself. I did not need the assistance of any integrator or consultant. It was all handled in-house. 

View full review »

For the deployment process, we have to perform an assessment because it's quite complex. There are a lot of parameters that need to be counted before redeployment. So, an assessment is recommended before the deployment process.

View full review »

I used one person for the deployment of F5 BIG-IP LTM because it is easy to do.

View full review »

We did it in-house.

View full review »

We used an integrator to assist with the installation. We were pleased with the results. There was nothing to complain about the results.

View full review »

We did not use an integrator or consultant. We have a team in our organization.

View full review »

We implemented F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager ourselves. We didn't use a consultant or integrator for implementation, but we contacted their support team.

View full review »

In-house.

View full review »

We do the implementation of the solution.

View full review »

We used an in-house team.

View full review »

I did it myself. We have an IT team of 60 people.

View full review »

For deployment, we used one engineer only. The main point to consider is the client's position. We have to respect the client's business requirements.

View full review »

We did use technical support on the original engineering.

View full review »

We used consultants for the implementation of the solution. 

We have 10 to 12 managers supporting this solution.

View full review »

The initial migration was done by our technical team. 

The last implementation was done by the F5 team. I would rate them as a nine out of 10. I am not giving a 10 because we encountered some difficulties with the software upgrade from version 11 to version 12.

View full review »

This was implemented by an in-house team.

View full review »

In house, and I would rate their level of expertise as of the very best, since it was myself and a single colleague that built the entire infrastructure. View full review »

The number of people required for its deployment depends on the size of the deployment. For a very big deployment, you need less than three people. For a fairly normal or standard deployment, just one person would be fine.

View full review »

Our in-house team implements and deploys this solution to our customers. 

You need two or three people, including a security manager who will configure all of the rules and policies.

View full review »

We did the implementation of the solution in-house.

We have one engineer that handles the support of the F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager.

View full review »

Our in-house team takes care of the maintenance. There are three people who manage it, and once every three months, we spend 30 or 40 minutes reading and clearing up the logs.

View full review »

The deployment can take some time because you can do a lot of configuring to meet the needs of the use cases for clients. This will take more time to configure the different areas than just the general install. We typically have two technicians on site doing the deployments.

View full review »