F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Stability

Ritesh-Bakhru - PeerSpot reviewer
Major Account Manager at Check Point Software

It is a stable solution and I would rate it 9 out of 10. 

View full review »
Mahmoud-Yassin - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of IT Infrastructure and Security Operations at United Arab Bank

I rate LTM nine out of 10 for stability.

View full review »
SE
Senior Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

The TMOS of F5 BIG-IP LTM has a mid-layer that is an open source software and the user's management layer which can cause some issues for potential security risks. Other solutions have operating systems that are more secure, such as Cisco, Juniper, and Huawei.

People tend not to use F5 BIG-IP LTM because of this issue. They prefer to use more proprietary solutions, such as Apple solutions which typically can be more secure.

Overall the solution is stable as long as you have the updates and proper configurations.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RP
Sr. Architect at a media company with 10,001+ employees

I think it is very stable. 

View full review »
JO
Senior Network Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

It has been stable and reliable. It has been working well for us.

View full review »
AC
Senior Technical Consultant at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

It is quite stable. I never faced any issues. I would rate it ten out of ten for the LTM. It's a very stable product.

View full review »
OD
Design and Conception Engineer at SFR

As far as I can tell, it's a stable and secure solution. 

View full review »
RJ
General Manager at Seriti Resources

It is a stable product.

View full review »
Saurabh-Pal - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Security Specialist at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

It is a stable solution. I would rate it an eight out of ten. Rather than having separate appliances for each virtual machine, the F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) allows multiple virtual machines to run on one appliance. However, if one of those virtual portions is no longer available, it can cause issues.

View full review »
Mohammed Abdul Rahman - PeerSpot reviewer
F5 Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It is a stable product. There have not been any issues with stability, and I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

View full review »
JS
Operator at Capgemini Engineering

The solution is stable. 

View full review »
KV
Principle Architect (retired recently) at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

I've been very impressed. Once you get it working, it's been very stable.

View full review »
Michael-Yuen - PeerSpot reviewer
COO at International Household Retail Company Ltd

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is a stable and reliable solution.

View full review »
MI
Tax Department at a government with 10,001+ employees

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is stable, so I'm rating it nine out of ten.

View full review »
MD
Senior Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

In terms of stability, it is stable, but we have a regular update program because of the security vulnerabilities, meaning bugs. So it is an ongoing thing maintaining them.

It's a bit of an overhead at the moment.

View full review »
TH
Senior IT Engineer at Lumeris

It seems very stable. I've had no problems with stability at all. It's been rock solid, from the perspective of staying in line and working as expected.

I did individual testing. We were doing very small tests to start, 25 megabits. So, I was driving close to 25 megabits through it. Memory and CPU, I thought might be a bit of a concern, but overall it seemed good. It was doing what I needed it to do, and doing it well, so I didn't notice anything in my traffic.

View full review »
Kodanda Ramji C.S - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager | Engineering | Cloud Managed Services at Sify Technologies

The tool is stable.

View full review »
KO
Network Engineer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is very stable.

We are a broadcast company. We have streaming services running behind this box. This streaming service has been released, with 19 to 20 streams. We haven't received any complaints about these streams since the streaming service was deployed behind F5. Despite the fact that these streams consume a lot of bandwidth and have millions of sessions. We haven't received many complaints about them.

View full review »
EF
Managing Director at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It is very stable. It's a pretty solid product.

Our clients use it pretty heavily. Most all of them are production workloads and some of them are external facing workloads, so you can see seasonal peaks.

View full review »
Saneesh Pv - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Security Specialist at GBM

The solution's stability is pretty good.

View full review »
John Bayangos - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Infrastructure Engineer at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

The stability and reliability are great. I'd rate stability nine out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

View full review »
MariosChristodoulou - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Information Officer at F.P. eSafe Solutions LTD

The stability is very good. The performance is reliable. It doesn't crash or freeze. We don't find there are a lot of bugs or glitches. 

View full review »
Roni Wijaya - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President of It Operations at Artajasa Pembayaran Elektronis

It is a stable solution. I rate its stability a ten out of ten.

View full review »
MahesaPutra - PeerSpot reviewer
Presales at Efficient IT Systems Ltd

It is a stable solution. I would rate it a ten out of ten. 

View full review »
MahesaPutra - PeerSpot reviewer
Presales at Efficient IT Systems Ltd

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

View full review »
KL
Head of Presales at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

BIG-IP LTM is quite stable - sometimes there are security vulnerabilities, but they inform us when a patch is needed. 

View full review »
UmeshKumar2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior System Administrator at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

LTM is a stable product.

View full review »
UzochikwaEnunwa - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise architect at Kyndryl

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is pretty stable. It's one of the most stable products that I know, when it comes to load balancing and traffic.

View full review »
OD
Security IT Manager at IFAT Group

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable and the performance has been good.

View full review »
BE
Network Security Engineer at Data Consult

It's a stable product.

View full review »
YA
Co-Founder and CEO at PT Eugenea Kreasi Utama

It's a stable solution. We don't have any issues with the stability of the F5 product.

View full review »
MA
Security Technical Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

It is a stable solution.

View full review »
Abduh  Rumfot - PeerSpot reviewer
It Security Consultant at juke

I rate the stability of F5 BIG-IP LTM a nine out of ten.

View full review »
PM
Solution Architect at Softcell Technologies Limited

It's a stable product.

View full review »
SA
Lead Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

It's a stable solution.

View full review »
AR
Sr. SAP Portfolio Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Its stability is good.

View full review »
RS
DevOps Manager at TaxACT

It is very stable. I have no concerns regarding stability for F5.

We are seasonal, so we go from low to high volumes. F5 has never been a concern of ours for stability.

View full review »
it_user109836 - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Leader Mainframe & Webservices at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

I have not yet encountered any stability issues.

View full review »
WM
Network and Security Engineer at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We find this tool stable. We are sensitive to changes, and for us, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is stable.

View full review »
LM
Sr. Network Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

The stability is very good. We have to power off a system to reboot it after firmware or other updates, but I have not had a problem with the stability of the units at all. We had a system cluster go down but that was a physical issue with the hard drive. They shipped us out a new one, plugged it back in, and it almost self-configures. We had to put some details in the hard drive, but it takes the configuration from the other units and runs well. We have had zero downtime over the last five years.

View full review »
GJ
Staff Engineer at UbiNavi

Performance: Using the product, applications are jittery.

View full review »
Rajnish Niraj - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder at Fencesense

The stability of F5 BIG-IP LTM is great.

View full review »
ST
Director at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

It is very stable.

View full review »
it_user858369 - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant Vice President at Nagarro

We have faced security stability issues, but we work around it.

View full review »
MufeedSiaj - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Security Presales Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

BIG-IP LTM is completely stable, and its performance is good.

View full review »
Hilman Gunawan - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at PT Nusantara Compnet Integrator

F5 BIG-IP is a stable solution. It is quite mature and does not have many concerns.

View full review »
AhmedIsmael - PeerSpot reviewer
Network & Telecom Manager at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is stable.

View full review »
it_user521841 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Data Centers Operations at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees

It is a stable product but sometimes we have some issues. I have other products that are competitors of F5, and they are also good. The performance of F5 so far is good.

Usually, because we are responsible for providing high availability, we run our architecture with redundancy. Usually, for example, when I have F5, I have a couple of F5s, the active one and the standby one. Today, I had problems. I don't know what happened; it couldn't reload automatically. The other one assumed that I have problems with my infrastructure. That's unfortunately the life of an operations guy.

View full review »
EZ
Network Presales Manager at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

F5 BIG-IP is very stable.

View full review »
FM
Works at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees

F5s are rock solid. I've seen them deploy in major data centers and they're rock solid.

View full review »
JW
Chief Security Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

The stability seems fine. We provide fault tolerance with HA, so we have two of them up and running. We have built in integration. Therefore, we do not worry about workload issues

View full review »
GS
Security Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

I have not encountered any stability issues. It is a very stable product, even in big, high-load deployments. What I mean is that all F5 Hardware appliances are very stable and does not cause any performance degradation or failure when it has a high load (Of course a supported load).

We have deployment for different modules of F5 (LTM, ASM, CGNAT...) in Data Centers and in Telco's Public network, and we have never heard any complaints or of issues from our clients regarding the performance. - no packet drops, delays or disconnections.

View full review »
it_user223881 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Stability has never been an issue with F5 BIG-IP. The product is geared predominantly at providing stability and resiliency across your infrastructure.

View full review »
MahesaPutra - PeerSpot reviewer
Presales at Efficient IT Systems Ltd

We have over 50 customers using this solution and it's very stable. 

View full review »
MO
Senior Network and Security Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

BIG-IP LTM's hardware is stable, and the operating system is great. 

View full review »
Md. Robiul Awoul - PeerSpot reviewer
Deputy manager at Oculin Tech

I have found F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) to be stable.

View full review »
SM
Specialist in Communication and Network Security at a security firm with 11-50 employees

It is very stable.

View full review »
UP
Network Security Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees

F5 is very stable. We have gone 300 days with no failures.

View full review »
PK
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

I don't think too much stress placed on it. In F5 Studio, the stability been very good.

View full review »
it_user521838 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Architect/Application Administrator at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We haven't had any major downtime. The solution comes with a high availability situation, and I've never seen a situation where it was down, because even when you do the patch, you patch one side and then the other, and so always one side at least is up. I haven't noticed it to be down.

View full review »
LF
Security Governance at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
PK
IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

This solution is stable. We have not experienced any issues.

View full review »
it_user1356177 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Security Engineer at a cloud provider with 11-50 employees

This is a very stable solution. I've been using their products for years and have never had any issues. 

View full review »
it_user744186 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Network Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

We have not had issues with the stability, though we have experienced issues with the flexibility.

View full review »
TA
Senior solution architect at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

I think this solution is very stable. 

View full review »
JC
Associate Systems Engineer at Frontline Education

It contributes to our traffic by about fifty percent. That's why we love it. We have never had any issues.

We put a lot of stress on our F5 on-premise. We have support, which is great. It is a ten out of ten.

View full review »
AhmedYoussef1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Security Consultant at Westcon-Comstor

This product is very stable. I have seen some instability with newly released versions, so I normally wait for a stable release before I upgrade an older one.

View full review »
Mahmoud-Yassin - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of IT Infrastructure and Security Operations at United Arab Bank

The solution is stable overall. 

View full review »
CS
Associate CSA at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Its stability has been great. I haven't had any issues with it in terms of downtime.

View full review »
JU
Security Professional Services at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

This year, we had a couple of issues. We found some bugs in version 15. They are very good, however, at finding the issue and generating a hotfix quickly so that we can apply the hotfix to the device. In the general, I would say that version 15 has been very stable overall.

View full review »
GV
Architect - Cloud Serviced at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

We did not find any stability issues while working on it. 

Bugs are part of any solution and they are fixed with every release, as with any vendor.

View full review »
it_user147228 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Security Specialist with 1,001-5,000 employees
At the module level, no. They are not as stable as System Z, but they are not far off. Hardware can be a little more susceptible to failure at the component level. View full review »
KN
Service Delivery Engineer - Network Security Lead at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

It is very stable.

View full review »
NH
CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

This is a stable product.

View full review »
RG
Technical Product Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

It is a stable product. It runs on TMOS, traffic management operating system. This is very stable. 

If they see that an upgrade required, they provide you the release and they provide you the release notes, so you can upgrade your TMOS version and at any time. You can also open a case and they can guide you on how to upgrade your TMOS version.

They also keep an eye on vulnerability. If there is a bug or any sort of vulnerability in their operating system, they will immediately release an update. So the product is so much more stable compared to any load balancers on the planet at the moment.

View full review »
TB
Solutions Architect - Telecom & Network Infrastructure at a non-tech company with 501-1,000 employees

The solution is very stable and scales easily. Our networking team deals with the maintenance.

View full review »
it_user591900 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Stability is one of the advantages. It's very stable.

View full review »
it_user850398 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees
MM
Lead Network Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

All systems have bugs, and F5 is not an exception. 

In my experience, I didn't face any critical bugs that stopped the deployment. 

I don't think that F5 is worse than other vendors in this perspective.

View full review »
SR
Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

The solution is extremely stable. We haven't had an issue in years. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is good. It's reliable.

View full review »
SP
Technical Specialist - Network & Security at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

We've had the solution installed for a year now and it is working as it should. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find it stable and reliable. It's been a good experience so far.

View full review »
it_user526731 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Network Engineer at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

Older OS releases may have had some bugs (active/active on reboot, I think we saw on one OS version). Very stable OS over all. We had one issue on our upgrade to 11.x where I had to engage F5 support. But they resolved it.

View full review »
SG
Director Technology Solutions with 11-50 employees

Not with the GA versions. Obviously, the betas are not that stable.

View full review »
YU
Security Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

I have found F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager to be stable.

View full review »
SS
Site Reliability Engineer at Apple

The stability is great. We put our production load on it, which is very stressful.

View full review »
DK
Head Of Technology at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

BIG-IP is stable and we plan to continue using it. We don't want to change because we're happy with what it's doing unless we switch over to the cloud. I think that cloud sizing is too heavy.

View full review »
JC
Director Public Sector at Smart Tronix Inc

We put a lot of stress on the application. It is very stable.

View full review »
it_user717243 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
it_user848262 - PeerSpot reviewer
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Solution Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

It is the perfect solution when you have high workloads in your IT environment.

View full review »
it_user799992 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
AF
Technical Team Leader at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

The stability is almost there. Sometimes it hangs or there are unpredictable performance issues.

View full review »
it_user171753 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees

Unfortunately, we faced hardware failures and a lot of other problems, as well.

With the hardware failure problem, we faced a management problem via the GUI. We could only manage the device through the CLI. The issue was caused by a firmware bug.

In addition, health check statistics like CPU and memory utilization were not correct.

It is F5’s responsibility to solve those problems, and I don’t know how they can release firmware with such bugs to their customers.

View full review »
Hilman Gunawan - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at PT Nusantara Compnet Integrator

The solution is stable.

View full review »
SB
Senior IT Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

This solution is very stable.

View full review »
SN
Developer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

The product is very stable. We put a decent amount of stress on it given our load.

View full review »
it_user617790 - PeerSpot reviewer
Games, Apps and Web Developer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees

When WAF is enabled, you can see a decrease in performance.

View full review »
it_user860436 - PeerSpot reviewer
Ingeniero at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is very stable. We have not had many problems.

View full review »
it_user750990 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Security Administrator at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Overall, it's stable. There are cases which are not so much about stability but, rather, about functionality and false positives.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.