F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Stability
It is a stable solution and I would rate it 9 out of 10.
View full review »I rate LTM nine out of 10 for stability.
View full review »SE
reviewer2129115
Senior Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
The TMOS of F5 BIG-IP LTM has a mid-layer that is an open source software and the user's management layer which can cause some issues for potential security risks. Other solutions have operating systems that are more secure, such as Cisco, Juniper, and Huawei.
People tend not to use F5 BIG-IP LTM because of this issue. They prefer to use more proprietary solutions, such as Apple solutions which typically can be more secure.
Overall the solution is stable as long as you have the updates and proper configurations.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RP
reviewer1250289
Sr. Architect at a media company with 10,001+ employees
I think it is very stable.
View full review »JO
reviewer1706595
Senior Network Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
It has been stable and reliable. It has been working well for us.
View full review »AC
reviewer1739430
Senior Technical Consultant at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
It is quite stable. I never faced any issues. I would rate it ten out of ten for the LTM. It's a very stable product.
View full review »OD
Orphé DJEDJERO
Design and Conception Engineer at SFR
As far as I can tell, it's a stable and secure solution.
View full review »RJ
Rakesh Joshi
General Manager at Seriti Resources
It is a stable product.
View full review »It is a stable solution. I would rate it an eight out of ten. Rather than having separate appliances for each virtual machine, the F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) allows multiple virtual machines to run on one appliance. However, if one of those virtual portions is no longer available, it can cause issues.
View full review »It is a stable product. There have not been any issues with stability, and I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.
View full review »JS
Joel Soares De Jesus
Operator at Capgemini Engineering
The solution is stable.
View full review »KV
reviewer1897710
Principle Architect (retired recently) at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
I've been very impressed. Once you get it working, it's been very stable.
View full review »F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is a stable and reliable solution.
View full review »MI
Mohamed Intissar
Tax Department at a government with 10,001+ employees
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is stable, so I'm rating it nine out of ten.
View full review »MD
reviewer1589751
Senior Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
In terms of stability, it is stable, but we have a regular update program because of the security vulnerabilities, meaning bugs. So it is an ongoing thing maintaining them.
It's a bit of an overhead at the moment.
View full review »TH
Thomas Hejula
Senior IT Engineer at Lumeris
It seems very stable. I've had no problems with stability at all. It's been rock solid, from the perspective of staying in line and working as expected.
I did individual testing. We were doing very small tests to start, 25 megabits. So, I was driving close to 25 megabits through it. Memory and CPU, I thought might be a bit of a concern, but overall it seemed good. It was doing what I needed it to do, and doing it well, so I didn't notice anything in my traffic.
View full review »The tool is stable.
View full review »KO
reviewer1573344
Network Engineer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is very stable.
We are a broadcast company. We have streaming services running behind this box. This streaming service has been released, with 19 to 20 streams. We haven't received any complaints about these streams since the streaming service was deployed behind F5. Despite the fact that these streams consume a lot of bandwidth and have millions of sessions. We haven't received many complaints about them.
View full review »EF
Eric Foote
Managing Director at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
It is very stable. It's a pretty solid product.
Our clients use it pretty heavily. Most all of them are production workloads and some of them are external facing workloads, so you can see seasonal peaks.
View full review »The solution's stability is pretty good.
View full review »The stability and reliability are great. I'd rate stability nine out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze.
View full review »The stability is very good. The performance is reliable. It doesn't crash or freeze. We don't find there are a lot of bugs or glitches.
View full review »It is a stable solution. I rate its stability a ten out of ten.
View full review »It is a stable solution. I would rate it a ten out of ten.
View full review »Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
View full review »KL
Kok KeongLow
Head of Presales at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
BIG-IP LTM is quite stable - sometimes there are security vulnerabilities, but they inform us when a patch is needed.
View full review »LTM is a stable product.
View full review »F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is pretty stable. It's one of the most stable products that I know, when it comes to load balancing and traffic.
View full review »OD
Oren Dror
Security IT Manager at IFAT Group
The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable and the performance has been good.
View full review »BE
Bachir Elsitt
Network Security Engineer at Data Consult
It's a stable product.
View full review »YA
Yudi Aritonang
Co-Founder and CEO at PT Eugenea Kreasi Utama
It's a stable solution. We don't have any issues with the stability of the F5 product.
View full review »MA
reviewer1721355
Security Technical Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It is a stable solution.
View full review »I rate the stability of F5 BIG-IP LTM a nine out of ten.
View full review »PM
Priyesh MP
Solution Architect at Softcell Technologies Limited
It's a stable product.
View full review »SA
Satish Agarwal
Lead Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
It's a stable solution.
View full review »AR
reviewer1552263
Sr. SAP Portfolio Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Its stability is good.
View full review »RS
Robert Smith
DevOps Manager at TaxACT
It is very stable. I have no concerns regarding stability for F5.
We are seasonal, so we go from low to high volumes. F5 has never been a concern of ours for stability.
View full review »I have not yet encountered any stability issues.
View full review »WM
Walid Mouamar
Network and Security Engineer at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We find this tool stable. We are sensitive to changes, and for us, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is stable.
View full review »LM
reviewer1505658
Sr. Network Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
The stability is very good. We have to power off a system to reboot it after firmware or other updates, but I have not had a problem with the stability of the units at all. We had a system cluster go down but that was a physical issue with the hard drive. They shipped us out a new one, plugged it back in, and it almost self-configures. We had to put some details in the hard drive, but it takes the configuration from the other units and runs well. We have had zero downtime over the last five years.
View full review »GJ
Guojun Jin
Staff Engineer at UbiNavi
Performance: Using the product, applications are jittery.
View full review »The stability of F5 BIG-IP LTM is great.
View full review »ST
reviewer1633455
Director at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
It is very stable.
View full review »We have faced security stability issues, but we work around it.
View full review »BIG-IP LTM is completely stable, and its performance is good.
View full review »F5 BIG-IP is a stable solution. It is quite mature and does not have many concerns.
View full review »It is stable.
View full review »It is a stable product but sometimes we have some issues. I have other products that are competitors of F5, and they are also good. The performance of F5 so far is good.
Usually, because we are responsible for providing high availability, we run our architecture with redundancy. Usually, for example, when I have F5, I have a couple of F5s, the active one and the standby one. Today, I had problems. I don't know what happened; it couldn't reload automatically. The other one assumed that I have problems with my infrastructure. That's unfortunately the life of an operations guy.
EZ
Network8776
Network Presales Manager at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
F5 BIG-IP is very stable.
View full review »FM
Flight9875
Works at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees
F5s are rock solid. I've seen them deploy in major data centers and they're rock solid.
View full review »JW
ChiefSecd99d
Chief Security Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The stability seems fine. We provide fault tolerance with HA, so we have two of them up and running. We have built in integration. Therefore, we do not worry about workload issues
View full review »GS
Georges Samaha
Security Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
I have not encountered any stability issues. It is a very stable product, even in big, high-load deployments. What I mean is that all F5 Hardware appliances are very stable and does not cause any performance degradation or failure when it has a high load (Of course a supported load).
We have deployment for different modules of F5 (LTM, ASM, CGNAT...) in Data Centers and in Telco's Public network, and we have never heard any complaints or of issues from our clients regarding the performance. - no packet drops, delays or disconnections.
View full review »Stability has never been an issue with F5 BIG-IP. The product is geared predominantly at providing stability and resiliency across your infrastructure.
View full review »We have over 50 customers using this solution and it's very stable.
View full review »MO
reviewer1788060
Senior Network and Security Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
BIG-IP LTM's hardware is stable, and the operating system is great.
I have found F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) to be stable.
View full review »SM
reviewer1277325
Specialist in Communication and Network Security at a security firm with 11-50 employees
It is very stable.
View full review »UP
reviewer1448481
Network Security Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees
F5 is very stable. We have gone 300 days with no failures.
PK
Solutiond87c
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
I don't think too much stress placed on it. In F5 Studio, the stability been very good.
View full review »We haven't had any major downtime. The solution comes with a high availability situation, and I've never seen a situation where it was down, because even when you do the patch, you patch one side and then the other, and so always one side at least is up. I haven't noticed it to be down.
View full review »LF
ipmplspr538920
Security Governance at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Not so far.
View full review »PK
PradeepKumar11
IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
This solution is stable. We have not experienced any issues.
View full review »This is a very stable solution. I've been using their products for years and have never had any issues.
View full review »We have not had issues with the stability, though we have experienced issues with the flexibility.
View full review »TA
Thameem Ansari
Senior solution architect at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
I think this solution is very stable.
View full review »JC
Joshua Cruz
Associate Systems Engineer at Frontline Education
It contributes to our traffic by about fifty percent. That's why we love it. We have never had any issues.
We put a lot of stress on our F5 on-premise. We have support, which is great. It is a ten out of ten.
View full review »This product is very stable. I have seen some instability with newly released versions, so I normally wait for a stable release before I upgrade an older one.
View full review »The solution is stable overall.
CS
reviewer1352181
Associate CSA at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Its stability has been great. I haven't had any issues with it in terms of downtime.
View full review »JU
Jonathan Urrea
Security Professional Services at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
This year, we had a couple of issues. We found some bugs in version 15. They are very good, however, at finding the issue and generating a hotfix quickly so that we can apply the hotfix to the device. In the general, I would say that version 15 has been very stable overall.
View full review »GV
Girish Vyas
Architect - Cloud Serviced at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
We did not find any stability issues while working on it.
Bugs are part of any solution and they are fixed with every release, as with any vendor.
View full review »
At the module level, no. They are not as stable as System Z, but they are not far off. Hardware can be a little more susceptible to failure at the component level.
View full review »
KN
reviewer1483797
Service Delivery Engineer - Network Security Lead at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It is very stable.
View full review »NH
reviewer1480176
CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
This is a stable product.
View full review »RG
technica696483
Technical Product Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
It is a stable product. It runs on TMOS, traffic management operating system. This is very stable.
If they see that an upgrade required, they provide you the release and they provide you the release notes, so you can upgrade your TMOS version and at any time. You can also open a case and they can guide you on how to upgrade your TMOS version.
They also keep an eye on vulnerability. If there is a bug or any sort of vulnerability in their operating system, they will immediately release an update. So the product is so much more stable compared to any load balancers on the planet at the moment.
View full review »TB
reviewer1429230
Solutions Architect - Telecom & Network Infrastructure at a non-tech company with 501-1,000 employees
The solution is very stable and scales easily. Our networking team deals with the maintenance.
Stability is one of the advantages. It's very stable.
View full review »None at all.
View full review »MM
reviewer1527075
Lead Network Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
All systems have bugs, and F5 is not an exception.
In my experience, I didn't face any critical bugs that stopped the deployment.
I don't think that F5 is worse than other vendors in this perspective.
View full review »SR
Sanja Rakic
Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The solution is extremely stable. We haven't had an issue in years. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is good. It's reliable.
View full review »SP
SaurabhPal
Technical Specialist - Network & Security at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
We've had the solution installed for a year now and it is working as it should. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find it stable and reliable. It's been a good experience so far.
View full review »Older OS releases may have had some bugs (active/active on reboot, I think we saw on one OS version). Very stable OS over all. We had one issue on our upgrade to 11.x where I had to engage F5 support. But they resolved it.
SG
Reviewer702843
Director Technology Solutions with 11-50 employees
Not with the GA versions. Obviously, the betas are not that stable.
View full review »YU
reviewer1010148
Security Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
I have found F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager to be stable.
View full review »SS
Sathiya Shunmugasundaram
Site Reliability Engineer at Apple
The stability is great. We put our production load on it, which is very stressful.
View full review »DK
reviewer1441791
Head Of Technology at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
BIG-IP is stable and we plan to continue using it. We don't want to change because we're happy with what it's doing unless we switch over to the cloud. I think that cloud sizing is too heavy.
View full review »JC
Director1e9d
Director Public Sector at Smart Tronix Inc
We put a lot of stress on the application. It is very stable.
View full review »It is the perfect solution when you have high workloads in your IT environment.
View full review »It's stable.
View full review »AF
Technicab017
Technical Team Leader at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
The stability is almost there. Sometimes it hangs or there are unpredictable performance issues.
View full review »Unfortunately, we faced hardware failures and a lot of other problems, as well.
With the hardware failure problem, we faced a management problem via the GUI. We could only manage the device through the CLI. The issue was caused by a firmware bug.
In addition, health check statistics like CPU and memory utilization were not correct.
It is F5’s responsibility to solve those problems, and I don’t know how they can release firmware with such bugs to their customers.
View full review »The solution is stable.
View full review »SB
reviewer1418577
Senior IT Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
This solution is very stable.
View full review »SN
Develope0fe0
Developer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
The product is very stable. We put a decent amount of stress on it given our load.
View full review »When WAF is enabled, you can see a decrease in performance.
View full review »It is very stable. We have not had many problems.
View full review »Overall, it's stable. There are cases which are not so much about stability but, rather, about functionality and false positives.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.