The price is high compared to other solutions like FortiWeb.

I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with one being cheap and ten being expensive. 

The price of Imperva Web Application Firewalls is expensive compared to others.

The pricing is somewhat expensive. It is actually a huge investment when compared to other countries.

Not only that, but Imperva went on to separate the WAF and DAM management gateways, making it so that each would have to be managed and licensed separately, incurring the cost of additional investments.

On a related note, there was another licensing issue we encountered where we had a subscription for account takeover prevention features, but these features had been moved by Imperva from the on-premises instance to the cloud. Since we had not moved to the cloud at that point, we did not have access to these features anymore.

It is very expensive. A basic license costs around $10,000. This is the only disadvantage of the solution. Everything else is pretty good.

Imperva Web Application Firewall is very expensive.

I am not sure of the exact licensing costs of the solution. The licensing is a management decision. The costs and payments are handled by them.

The cost is reasonable. W have 50 clients and 10 websites per customer. 

Imperva Web Application Firewall price is higher compared to other solutions. However, everything is included in the price.

There is a license for this solution and we purchase the license annually with no additional fees.

Make sure you understand the way that Imperva charges. It's very affordable. However, I would like to see a package with the Virtual Patching included. You get to do patching separately.

It is a very affordable solution.

We sell three-year licenses for Imperva Web Application Firewall to our customers. The price is a little expensive.

Imperva Web Application Firewall's pricing is expensive. 

I rate the solution’s pricing a seven out of ten. Some solutions are cheaper than Imperva. Imperva’s pricing is a bit higher in the market since it offers a full-blown WAF.

The cost of this solution depends on the platform. For example, you may be buying virtual or you may be buying appliances. It also depends on the number of environments and the bandwidth that is required.

Imperva Web Application Firewall is expensive. 

The solution is very affordable and the cloud is making it even easier in terms of cost savings. 

It's an excellent product, but it can be very costly. 

Those customers who are capable of buying are buying it. 

Those customers who are not able to buy this premium product due to budget constraints explore other options.

The licensing model is yearly. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. 

The solution's pricing is an issue. 

Licensing should be chosen based on the current infrastructure setup and growth plans. Purchasing appliances of different types may lead to unnecessary/unjustified expenditures and ultimately lead to complications in administration.

The tool is expensive. 

We have a yearly license, but I'm unsure of the pricing.

I'm not sure what the exact licensing costs are for the solution. I can't speak to the pricing. It's not part of my responsibilities to cover sales or billing.

Licensing can range from one to twenty thousand dollars annually. Additionally, some features, including software support, require an annual subscription as well.

When it comes to the cost, there are different sets of customers. Some are SMB and veteran customers who go with the cloud version of Imperva, which is a managed service. The next-level customers and enterprise will select the on-premises version along with the cloud. They prefer the hybrid environment.

There are a couple of different licensing models. One is with respect to the Cloud and is based on the number of applications you have to protect. The on-premises model is based on the throughput that is required to be inspected.

There are some licenses that you have to buy to use some features.

Its price could be better. Price is always important because, at the end of the day, customers have a budget. If you can meet the budget, you can sell, and if you don't, you cannot sell.

Everybody complains about the price of this solution. 

The price of this solution is a little bit high compared to competitors.

Try to use a cloud-based and/or managed solution instead of managing a WAF internally; that should be the first preference.