PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Other Solutions Considered
I have evaluated Zap.
View full review »My company has paid for the license for the solution. The price of the solution could be less expensive.
View full review »NS
Nagaraj Sheshachalam
Lead Cyber Security engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Client provided product
View full review »Buyer's Guide
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We considered using OWASP Zed Attack Proxy, which is open source. We decided to use this alongside the current solution, and also with IBM Security AppScan.
This tool is more accurate than the other solutions that we use and reports fewer false positives.
View full review »MM
reviewer1966164
Cyber Security Specialist at a university with 10,001+ employees
Before choosing PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional I compared other tools, such as IBM AppScan. I found that PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional was more into web application security. The solution is very helpful, easy to use, and install. They have a free version and anybody can start within minutes.
What solution is best depends on the client size and their requirements. If the client has a large enough budget, or if they're looking for an overall feature, I would recommend PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional as the primary go-to tool. However, if they're having any specific requirements, then they will have to think about using IBM AppScan.
View full review »SS
Shrey Sethi
Penetration Tester at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
In comparing features, there is no real competition for this solution. There are a couple of open-source products, but there is no real competitor for the Burp Suite.
View full review »NC
reviewer1112304
IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
When we had an issue with scanning, we did look into exploring other options like OWASP Zap, Acunetix, etc. We stayed with Burp because we had it set up in our system, and then they had our scanning issue fixed.
View full review »Before choosing this product, I evaluated free products - Arachni, OWASP ZAP, w3af, Vega - and commercial products - Acunetix, Qualys Web Application Scanner.
View full review »I evaluated Charles Proxy, Fiddler, and Context App Tool (CAT), which are great HTTP proxies. I like CAT and Burp as the best free ones.
View full review »We tested all of the free apps and could not find a stable all-in-one solution other than BurpSuite.
View full review »I am a consistent user of web application scanners and penetration testing solutions.
I have used Qualys WAS, OWASP ZAP, sqlmap, Paros Proxy, and Nikto. But nothing stands close to Burp, because this tool has everything in one single portable powerful package.
View full review »SD
reviewer1471662
Lead Software Architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
We evaluated OWASP Zap, which was fully open-source.
We use the community version and found that Burp was easier and more useful.
The interface is better in PortSwigger Burp.
View full review »AS
reviewer939417
IT Auditor & Compliance Officer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
We did evaluate other options before choosing this solution.
View full review »AG
reviewer1458246
Cyber Security Analyst at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We did consider one more product and had a discussion about the product features. We found PortSwigger to be the best match for our business.
JA
Securitydbe0
Security Analyst at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Before choosing this tool, no, I didn't evaluate any other options. I know what I wanted and I'm very happy with it.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.