Microsoft Teams Reviews

We use Teams for customer team meetings and partner team meetings. We also use it for internal communication.

The most valuable feature for me is the chat. It is what I use the most because if I have to reach a team member, given that we are all working remotely, it is the easiest way to do it. 

The user interface needs to be improved. After six months of working with it, I still find the UI a little clunky when it comes to sharing content and moving around between features like the calendar and files. Sometimes, when I'm on a call and somebody asks if I can share a file or a link, I find it clunky to get to where those pieces are. Overall, navigation is a little sticky.

We have been using Microsoft Teams for about six months.

For what we do, it is absolutely stable. We have an enterprise team and it is used constantly.

We have had some fairly large meetings on here and I think that it scales fine.

I have never needed to contact technical support.

Prior to using Teams, we were using WebEx. We still use WebEx from time to time, but for the most part, we use Teams. It is better for us because Teams is integrated with all of the backend Microsoft environment that we already have. For example, we use SharePoint, ShareFile, and others. It has files integrated as well, so we can place internal files for review on Teams.

WebEx is more of a platform just for jumping on a call with a few people.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

I use the Teams for internal communication like to reach my colleague and share information. 

I like the video call and document-sharing features. 

The solution needs to be integrated with Microsoft Planner. I have also faced issues with stability in the first month. 

I have been using the product for five to six months. 

The product is stable most of the time and I would rate it around six to seven out of ten. 

The solution is very scalable and my company has 400 users for the product. 

The product's support is good. 

Positive

Teams' setup is easy and I would rate it around eight to nine out of ten. 

I use Teams' free version. 

I would rate the product a seven out of ten. Teams works very well for a medium to big company. I don't think the tool is the best when you are the only person and want to reach anybody. 

• Collaboration
• Meetings
• Voice, video calls, and chats

It has allowed for collaboration during the COVID-19 situation (work from home).

• Calling
• Setting up teams
• Meetings
• File transfer

Whiteboard should be standard rather than an app.

Six months.

The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to share documents easily.

It is challenging to sign up for a new device for the solution. It could be better.

We have been using the solution for three years. At present, we use the latest version.

I rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten.

We have more than 2000 solution users in our organization. I rate its scalability a seven out of ten.

The solution's initial setup is easy. I rate the process a nine out of ten.

The solution is very secure. I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use the product for communication and as a channel for discussion on projects. 

The solution integrates with project management products like Jira. 

The solution should improve its user interface and recording features. 

I have been working with the product for five years. 

I would rate the product's stability a ten out of ten. 

I would rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten. My company has 6000 employees. 

Our first line of support is within the company. If they cannot resolve it, we open a ticket and get an immediate response from the Microsoft team.

The product is better than Zoom in terms of features and capabilities. 

Our team did the solution's implementation. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

The corporate world widely accepts the solution for virtual meetings. Also, it has good availability.

The solution's login process could be more straightforward. It takes four to five minutes to load. They need to improve their login speed. Also, its UI needs to be easy and accessible. In addition, the name and picture display options once we log into the meeting should be more flexible.

We use the solution to schedule meetings or virtual calls with customers and vendors.

It is a scalable solution.

The solution's initial setup is easy if you have a Microsoft account.

We don't have to pay for the solution.

In comparison, Zoom has a faster login process. Also, it has better UI and security features.

It is a good and trusted tool from a security perspective. Also, it is the best solution for corporate use cases. I rate it a seven out of ten.

For all the meetings and events we are using Microsoft Teams.

The most valuable features of Microsoft Teams are the ease of use. It is very good for a small virtual office for meetings and calendars which sync well together.

Microsoft Teams could improve because it is heavy on bandwidth. We have some access points and when we have 30 or 40 users on it with Microsoft Teams calls can drop. WebEx does not use as much bandwidth.

When someone joins a meeting we are not able to kick them out.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for approximately three years.

Microsoft Teams is stable.

The scalability of Microsoft Teams is good and is easy to do.

We have approximately 450 - 500 users using the solution.

I have used Skype for Business and WebEx.

The initial setup of Microsoft Teams is straightforward.

We have a license needed to use Microsoft Teams.

I would advise others to set the parameters correctly for security. You can transfer files between users in the chat window which is helpful.

I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten.

I am a freelancer. The decision on what solution to use is determined by my customers. Some of my customers have over 5,000 employees who are using Teams.

Teams is a virtual meeting solution. We use Teams to work with our clients purely with video conferences.

This is a stable solution, I have not faced any problems using the video conferencing.

As an app installed, Microsoft Teams is resource-consuming. When using it from their browser-based application, I experienced login problems.

For future releases, I would like to see Microsoft Teams make a lighter application and drop some features.

Microsoft Teams has all the features it needs, however, I noticed on some laptops that the features are not available. For example, if you want to change your virtual background, not all laptops have the hardware configured to link with that feature. The solution should make all features available irrespective of hardware configuration.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for two years.

This is a stable solution, I have not faced any problems using the video conferencing.

Microsoft is always scalable, it depends on the level of licensing an organization has purchased.

The initial setup of Microsoft Teams is easy. I would rate setup a 5 out of 5 as the solution is straightforward.

I have had concerns with login and resource consumption using Microsoft Teams, I would consider Zoom or Cisco WebEx as better solutions.

Organizations should consider what features they want to utilize. If they want all features to be available, they need to have an enterprise category system. Logging in from a home segment device will not have all features available. 

I would rate the solution an 8 out of 10.