Webex Reviews

We use the solution to handle our remote meetings. If we need to have international meetings or client meetings, we use this solution. We also use it if we need to share desktops remotely or remotely control a customer's environment. We use it to record calls as well. 

All the features the solution offers are great. The sharing control menu is very easy to use, especially when you compare it to a technology like Zoom. It also looks and feels very professional. The user interface is great. The layout is quite nice and it's not offensive in any way which lends itself to a certain level of professionalism during calls. 

It's easy to dial the numbers and the process of connecting a call is very intuitive.

Sometimes the call quality is not that great. When you call in, especially in an international situation, or if you have people calling from different continents or geographical locations, there can be issues with the call itself.  

I would like to see improved chatting functionality. The chat boxes need to be more prominent. It would be nice if you could edit your chat, and easily add attachments into it, similar to Slack, to make it easier to share, sidebar, and communicate during calls. It's very important to add some sort of editing function into the chats. You want to be professional and fix any mistakes and not just leave them there.

I've been using the solution for five years now.

I'd rate technical support at a seven out of ten. They're okay. I haven't used them too much.

We have a business relationship with WebEx. We're a solution partner.

I personally am a cloud architect and I work for many international companies.

I would rate the solution eight out of ten.

We use the solution to hold conferences with customers.

The important feature is breakout sessions. We can create a breakout session if we want to hold a conference and make a room only for some people at the meeting.

The solution could make it easier to share the files with the customer.

I rate the solution’s scalability a ten out of ten.

Technical support is good.

Positive

I have used Microsoft Team before. I prefer Microsoft settings because we can create and use Microsoft online. It's easier to share the files with the customer. 

The initial setup is easy.

I rate the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.

Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

We use the product for attending training webinars, meetings, and team collaboration.

The product's most valuable flexibility of features is particularly in terms of the user experience, from joining meetings to the controls available during the meetings. We can easily manage the audio-visual aspects as well.

There could be a feature available to record the meetings.

I have been using Webex for half a year. At present, I use the latest version.

I rate the platform's stability a ten out of ten.

The number of times we use the platform depends on a particular virtual event. It varies from every day to once in a week or month. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten.

We use different webinar platforms, including Webex, Teams, and GoToWebinar, depending on the organization's needs.

Compared to Teams, I rate Webex's initial setup process a ten.

Webex has enhanced the remote team collaboration process regarding time management and cost savings. The whole platform works well in terms of productivity. Its integration with other tools has improved workflow efficiency.

It is an easy-to-use tool with lots of reliability. It should be considered by every potential user looking for a meeting platform.

I rate it a nine out of ten.

We use the solution for multiple purposes, including collaborative meetings and online education through web events, seminars, practical sessions, and lab sessions.

The solution provides a secure environment for meetings. Along with this, its feature for conducting exams works the best. In addition, it helps the instructor to monitor student engagement during online educational sessions.

They should integrate the solution with multiple hardware vendors.

I have been using the solution for more than ten years.

It is a stable solution. I rate its stability ten out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. I rate its scalability ten out of ten.

Technical support is optional for the solution as it is never out of connectivity or has latency issues.

I have used Zoom and Microsoft Teams before. In comparison, Webex provides additional features and a standard license policy.

The solution's initial setup process is straightforward. 

The solution is low-cost for a hybrid model.

It is a unique solution. I rate it ten out of ten.

We use Webex to provide remote support and OEM access if we have any problems.

WebEx provides the option to record the chat or delete it. You can also dial into the video on your mobile to communicate with the engineer or whoever. One aspect we like most is that the audio is clear. That is one of the most valuable features of WebEx.

I would like it if Webex's mobile interface had all the same application integration as the desktop. Maybe the applications work on mobile as well, but we have not tried it yet.

We started using Webex in 2019, so we've been using it for about two years. 

In the time that we've been using Webex, we haven't seen any jerking or lag on in the remote sessions. The performance is smooth compared to other third-party applications. 

We don't need to scale Webex because I work in a data center. We don't have many people working at the same time, and we're working in shifts, so 10 people clock in, and 10 clock out. That means we only need 10 licenses.

Cisco support is great. 

We tried Zoom, Team Viewer, and another solution. We prefer Webex because it works well on the web application compared to others. 

Installing Webex is simple. It doesn't take more than half an hour or 45 minutes tops, and there is no maintenance after installation.  

Features matter more than the price for us. As long as we get all the features we want and it fits our budget, then the price doesn't matter. I can't speak for other companies. We have tried other applications, and we run into some problems that we don't see in Webex. 

I rate Webex 10 out of 10. We've recommended it to many of the companies we work with. Two or three out of 10 have gone with Webex. 

Webex has frequent updates and it is very good.

Webex could improve by adding captions for the translation.

I have been using Webex for approximately five years.

Webex is a stable solution.

Webex is scalable, there are rooms that people can join.

We have approximately 2,000 users using this solution in my organization.

The technical support from Webex is good.

The initial setup of Webex is easy.

We have approximately four or five engineers that support this solution.

I rate Webex a seven out of ten.

I use this tool to communicate with my team. I have a developer team, so I use this tool to communicate with them. We use both the chat and the video conferencing system on our computers.

The noise cancellation feature is great. When you have a call, the noise cancellation during it is really good. It's the best one if you're looking for that specific feature. We haven't tried Zoom, however, compared to Microsoft Teams, WebEx is a lot better.

The initial setup is really easy.

The solution has been very stable. 

The scalability is quite good.

If you decide to use the paid version, you can have the scheduler and the meeting portal all on the same platform. 

The main issue is the performance in relation to the operating system. The base application uses a lot of resources. They could work on the performance of the application so that it's less heavy.

There are sometimes a lot of updates, however, we find the solution to be very stable right now. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

You can scale the solution if you need to. It's not a problem.

Right now, we have ten users that are connected to the solution. 

Our team is using it all the time. Everyone on the team works remotely; it's our main engagement channel.

As we grow our company, we'll likely increase usage. 

As I am leveraging the free version, I haven't used the support.

I also use Microsoft Teams. I use both right now. 

We used Microsoft Teams, however, we changed to WebEx as the main channel due to the noise cancellation that wasn't good enough on Teams. Also, Microsoft Teams used a lot of resources on the operating system - so much so that the computer started to go slow when we used the application.

I simply downloaded the solution from Cisco's web page. 

The implementation is really easy. The difficult part is understanding the free version from the other plan that has a cost. At the first, they didn't have an online purchase of that version, so you have to contact a partner in order to buy the install. It's a bit confusing between both versions, the free and the paid version.

The solution does not require any maintenance. 

I use the free version of the solution. I don't pay for licensing at this time. 

We did try Zoom, however, you could only use it for 40 minutes, and that wasn't enough time for us.

I'm just a customer and an end-user. 

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. I'd recommend it to others. It's a good tool. 

We use Webex for virtual meetings.

The GUI is nice and easy to operate.

It should be more integrated with third-party vendors.

I have been working with Webex off and on for a couple of years.

We are using the latest version.

Webex is a stable product.

I have never needed to contact Webex technical support.

We also use Skype when Webex is not required.

We have recently upgraded to Teams.

The initial setup is similar to Zoom. It is straightforward and easy to install.

The installation takes less than 10 minutes.

There are no licensing fees.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I would rate Webex a nine out of ten.