Bamboo vs GoCD vs Travis CI comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlassian Logo
3,414 views|3,401 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Thoughtworks Logo
1,194 views|937 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Travis CI Logo
631 views|774 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bamboo, GoCD, and Travis CI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is a subscription required to use Bamboo."
  • "If Bamboo could provide more flexibility on pricing, that would help. On the agent side, if you want to increase the number of agents it should be less expensive. If they can provide some better pricing model, it will help, whether we are going to use it or are already using it."
  • "The server products for small teams used to offer excellent pricing. However, Atlassian has since changed the offering and the pricing is more expensive. I do still think the solution offers good value for money."
  • "The price of Bamboo is reasonable."
  • "I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."
  • More Bamboo Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's an open-source and free tool."
  • "This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."
  • More GoCD Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    A biased and subjective comparison of Bamboo and Jenkins as CI servers for mobile development, based on practical experience with both. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (Delivery, Distribution) has been around for quite a while. But surprisingly enough on a global scale it pretty much just got into its teen years in regards to mobile development. Well, subjectively, of course. You can see all levels of mobile CI these days. Some would still install builds from Xcode, others would have a quickly patched up build server under their desk. Xcode Bots meet the needs of yet another group of people. Travis CI is good and for open source projects it’s probably the best option. And guess what, I know few successful iOS development companies that develop apps for enterprise clients, and have no CI at all. The advanced level of CI would include distributed build systems with multiple build nodes, support for automated unit and UI tests, running tests on simulator and physical devices, automatic deployment to TestFlight, Hockey App, Over the Air, and much more. It becomes not just mobile development, but spans into areas like DevOps and others. Etsy’s blog post is somewhat outdated but still a very good example of where this path can take you. If you decide to take mobile CI under your total control, you have to pick a build server to start with. I personally have worked with Bamboo for 1.5 years and I’m dealing with Jenkins right now, so I have few insights… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and… more »
    Top Answer:I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten.
    Top Answer:The tools and capabilities of the system are extensive. It can be challenging for someone new to the system or ecosystem… more »
    Top Answer:Jenkins is overtaking the product. The product must enhance user experience. Jenkins has everything in a simple XML… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    5th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    3,414
    Comparisons
    3,401
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    542
    Rating
    7.7
    8th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    1,194
    Comparisons
    937
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    631
    Rating
    8.3
    17th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    631
    Comparisons
    774
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    GitLab logo
    Compared 43% of the time.
    Jenkins logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 30% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    CircleCI logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 60% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    Jenkins logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    TeamCity logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go
    Learn More
    Overview
    Bamboo is a continuous integration and delivery tool that ties automated builds, tests and releases together in a single workflow. It works great alongside JIRA and Stash providing a fully traceable deployment pipeline.
    GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers businesses a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. It was designed for continuous delivery and the concepts essential to this practice are built in at the core.
    Easily sync your GitHub projects with Travis CI and you'll be testing your code in minutes. Travis CI for private repositories has plans for every size project. With Travis CI testing your open source project is 100% free.
    Sample Customers
    Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire
    Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers
    Facebook, Heroku, Mozilla, Zendesk, twitter, Rails
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company40%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Marketing Services Firm10%
    Non Tech Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.