Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure Block Storage vs Microsoft Azure File Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
6,661 views|5,683 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
1,612 views|1,361 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
14,358 views|11,729 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 Glacier, Microsoft Azure Block Storage, and Microsoft Azure File Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services.
To learn more, read our detailed Public Cloud Storage Services Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The pricing is low, and it's dedicated to archiving is valuable to us.""I find Amazon S3 Glacier valuable for storing various documents like purchase orders, standard documents, and drawings.""The data archive feature is valuable.""The solution is stable.""AWS does support the ability for user controlled movement of data between regions for business continuance (BC), high availability (HA) and disaster recovery (DR).""We use the solution for migration.""Amazon S3 Glacier is a very cheap storage, where we store infrequently used data.""Amazon S3 Glacier is an easy-to-use solution."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pros →

"In terms of latency, bandwidth, and productivity, Azure Block Storage is better than other solutions.""What I like best about Microsoft Azure Block Storage is the accessibility because it's very easy for me to access it. You'll find different resources and documentation about the tool if you need to learn how to start.""The initial setup for the production areas was on premise, which is very simple.""The stability seems to be very reliable.""The tool is pretty easy to use.""Storing and then retrieving data are the most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Block Storage.""It can be deployed independently and supports every kind of deployment.""The setup is straightforward."

More Microsoft Azure Block Storage Pros →

"Its simplicity of use is most valuable. It's easy to start working with it and understand it. It's easier to transfer files between different users. I'm able to move files from my device to my manager's device without any issues or without facing any problems in between.""I like that Microsoft Azure File Storage works fine and is quick to deploy. It's also easy to connect to it, particularly when connecting it with my on-premise file servers.""The functionality is easy.""It's a scalable solution.""The product is a reliable cloud solution.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure File Storage is the cloud file storage capability.""The solution is easy to use.""It helps us with geo-redundancy."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pros →

Cons
"The user experience must be improved.""The product needs to improve cloud security.""Billing issues can be a nightmare. It's tough reaching the right person to get them sorted out.""The pricing is a bit expensive. There is room for improvement in costs.""Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand.""The product takes more time to secure data when the bandwidth is low.""The solution's cost optimization could be improved.""The solution's dashboard is a bit complicated and could be improved."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Cons →

"There should be a discount on Block Storage for people who use it more often.""Microsoft Azure Block Storage can improve the configuration to be more user-friendly.""One of the biggest challenges on Azure infrastructure is that sometimes we don't get what we want. Either we have to wait for it or contact support because something is not working for us... It's the system availability that is the difficult point.""Microsoft Azure Block Storage could improve by having integration with Amazon AWS. The file transfer could be easier.""The solution could use a couple of security features.""The cost of the solution has room for improvement. Microsoft Azure Block Storage is priced higher than alternative solutions.""The cache issue needs to be addressed to ensure that the correct file is downloaded, especially when it's done manually into the local storage.""I want to see my region added to the data center. I'm in Africa, and if a data center is specifically added under Central Africa, that will reduce data latency when accessing data."

More Microsoft Azure Block Storage Cons →

"Microsoft Azure File Storage is not that scalable. Once you reach the boundaries, you need to migrate to another solution.""The upload speed has room for improvement.""One thing that Azure File Storage could help us with is some kind of impact assessment. When we talk to some of our larger customers who have between 500 and 1,000 applications, we normally do an assessment of all these applications and then tell them which ones are ready to be lifted and shifted, and which ones need to re-architected. It would really help if Azure File Storage could come up with a better way to give estimations of the total investment required, including all costs incurred during the migration.""The product must provide better security functions.""Sometimes it takes very long to refresh the information.""Firewall rules should be introduced to secure the access date from any virus attacks. Anti-virus should be introduced in the work filtering and document filtering.""Azure File Storage's stability is okay, but sometimes we have trouble with the link to the Azure VPN disconnecting.""The pricing could be improved. They need to make the costs more transparent so users know what they will be charged and why ahead of time."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products."
  • "There is no license, you pay for what you use."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "The product is cheap."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving."
  • "The pricing must be improved."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data."
  • More Amazon S3 Glacier Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is affordable, and we only pay for what we use."
  • "For the first 50DB, they cost around $50. It's an open solution for everybody. Anybody can go to the Microsoft website and they can get the pricing for it. But the first 50GB of data is a default rate and then it increases for the next 500GB or something like that. It is a pay as you go solution. The more you use, the more you pay. That's normally how you pay for any cloud solutions."
  • "In terms of pricing, Azure is quite cheaper than AWS. However, I have recently read that Oracle Cloud Generation 2 storage is quite cheaper than Azure. I haven't used it yet. We need to look at a customer's requirements, and, based on that, we can suggest the storage. You can save at least 20% with Azure as compared to AWS, which is quite costly."
  • "Azure Block Storage is higher priced than its competitors."
  • "We pay around $300 to $400 a month for some scenarios where consumption is limited. However, going forward, we're seeing the likelihood of the cost coming to around $2,000 as consumption rises."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Block Storage could be less expensive."
  • "The cost is very low. The cost is something like $0.01 to $0.50 per gig. It's pay per use. We have a yearly license."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Block Storage is less expensive than other solutions on the market, such as Cloud Storage from GCP."
  • More Microsoft Azure Block Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."
  • "One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."
  • "The price is comparable to other competitive solutions."
  • "There are fewer hidden costs involved compared to other solutions, and when our customer is already a Microsoft partner, they typically have access to more affordable fees."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage has a reasonable price."
  • "I give the pricing of the solution a seven out of ten."
  • "One needs to pay according to the storage they plan to use in the solution. The payments are to be made yearly. It is usually monthly, but we opted for yearly subscriptions in our company."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive."
  • More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage… more »
    Top Answer:I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each… more »
    Top Answer:I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3… more »
    Top Answer:The product’s security features are valuable.
    Top Answer:The user interface is very difficult. It is not user-friendly. We need time to understand the product and create a… more »
    Top Answer:Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    6,661
    Comparisons
    5,683
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    350
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    1,612
    Comparisons
    1,361
    Reviews
    40
    Average Words per Review
    452
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    14,358
    Comparisons
    11,729
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    405
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Glacier
    MS Azure Block Storage
    MS Azure File Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

    Massively scalable cloud storage for your applications

    Store and help protect your data. Get durable, highly available data storage across the globe and pay only for what you use.

    Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

    Key scenarios:

    • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
    • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
    • Integrate modern applications with File storage
    • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data
    Sample Customers
    King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
    Mazda, BlinkBox, Rakuten Showtime, Xbox One, Serko, ChronoDrive
    Talon, Camden
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company42%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    Integrator4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization29%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Retailer13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Construction Company19%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise37%
    Large Enterprise44%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Public Cloud Storage Services
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.