Checkmarx Other Solutions Considered

Don Robbins
Software Configuration Manager at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
We were previously working with Azure. We switched because of their implementation of SQL Server. Checkmarx uses statements to move from database to database. Azure does not support that in its implementation at this time. Time will tell and Microsoft does improve their code over time. View full review »
Milind Dharmadhikari
Practice Head - IT Risk & Security Management Services at Suma Soft Private Limited
We evaluated the Fortify Static Code Analyzer and IBM Security AppScan, but our evaluation was not fully completed. We were happy with what we were seeing with Checkmarx, so we did not go ahead with the others. View full review »
EduardoBeltran
Director and Co-Founder at Ushiro-tec
We evaluated some products from a company in Spain. Checkmarx provided better functionality and options for us. View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Checkmarx. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2020.
431,790 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1375824
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I've looked at SonarQube. The basic difference between the two solutions is that Checkmarx is a bit more intelligent and can detect vulnerabilities better and faster than SonarQube. SonarQube is more focused on code and style formatting or code complexity. It depends on the priorities of the organization, as each has its own unique benefits. View full review »
CyberSecAn08987
Cyber Security Analyst at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
We did evaluate other options. View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Checkmarx. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2020.
431,790 professionals have used our research since 2012.