Cisco DNA Center Room for Improvement
Senior Network Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
With their provisioning status, if there's a failure in provisioning or in some type of task that DNA is trying to push out to a switch or whatever device, sometimes the task status errors or the provision errors are a little bit big.
I think they could provide a little more detail to someone when a task fails. It's an error code that tells you that this task has failed, but it doesn't get too deep into why it failed. The task failure reporting or provisioning failure reporting could be a little bit better in the UI, with more information given to the user.
From the CLI you can get much more information from MagLevs.
Also, the UI could use a little bit of improvement. I know that things have gotten a lot better in version 2, but I haven't worked with version 2 yet.
A feature that I would like to have seen is the true debt disaster recovery, which is now available in the 2.2.1 version.
More detailed information would be helpful, but you can get that information from the CLI but not everyone is comfortable working in the Linux shell.
Network and Data Center Supervisor at a educational organization with 51-200 employees
The network, data center, and SD-WAN are all being treated as different services, but I would like to have only one solution to manage all of them. Data is traveling from the inside to the outside layer, and I want to be able to fully control all of the data going in and out. It should not be set up as multi-service, but rather a single one.
If you have old Cisco hardware such as switches or access points, or they are from another vendor, then they will not work with this solution. The hardware will still function but you will not be able to control it with DNA.View full review »
Solution Selector Communication and IT Security at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The pricing of this solution could be improved.
There is a limitation with the number of VRFs that you can have in your network, and this has caused us problems with some customers.
This solution does not support IP version 6.
I would like to see better integration with Cisco Meraki.View full review »
We have had a lot of problems with the Cisco switches and have needed to upgrade the operating systems, which means that we have to upgrade the DNA. When we upgrade the DNA it means that we have to upgrade the ISE, also. If it is a large cluster then this process is painful.
DNA Center has been on the market for a few years and they need to update it.View full review »