We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Akamai CloudTest Logo
1,643 views|976 comparisons
Tricentis NeoLoad Logo
6,328 views|3,720 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Its licensing cost is very less.""Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I'm not exactly sure what the pricing is as it differs from client to client. That said, LoadRunner is expensive and NeoLoad is less expensive whereas JMeter is free.
Top Answer: There are still some glitches that they need to improve. We have given support feedback as well when we have some issues. They're very responsive and they do work to fix and improve issues. LoadRunner… more »
Ranking
16th
Views
1,643
Comparisons
976
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
6,328
Comparisons
3,720
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
500
Rating
8.2
Comparisons
Also Known As
SOASTA CloudTest
NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad
Learn More
Overview

Soasta's CloudTest rapidly builds realistic test scenarios using real user data, then tests, analyzes and repairs faster. CloudTest's visual test environment and real-time analytics test your website, mobile app and api backend to give you a streaming view of all your performance data while tests run from back-end systems to front end performance.

The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

Offer
Learn more about Akamai CloudTest
Learn more about Tricentis NeoLoad
Sample Customers
Chester Zoo
Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider13%
Retailer6%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
REVIEWERS
Retailer18%
Government18%
Computer Software Company18%
Individual & Family Service12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise76%
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Akamai CloudTest is ranked 16th in Performance Testing Tools while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 6th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Akamai CloudTest is rated 0.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts". Akamai CloudTest is most compared with Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and Eggplant Performance, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Tricentis Flood, BlazeMeter and Eggplant Performance.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.