Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Akamai Enterprise Application Access and Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two ZTNA as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is very convenient and stable because you don't have to worry about attacks to public IPs or public networks.""The capability of Akamai Enterprise Application Access is what you're looking for, it's giving you the service that you're looking for. It's simple and doesn't use an agent. It uses LCSD responders, and they have a lot of services around the globe. That's the reason that we were very interested in using it because it has a lot of coverage. This is because it's under the GDS umbrella.""Application Access's most valuable feature is the accessibility of enterprise tech protection."

More Akamai Enterprise Application Access Pros →

"I like Google Cloud IAP because it is easy to use and stable.""Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is a scalable solution.""The app provides ready-made services that we can talk to without issue.""It is a stable platform.""If you have a good understanding of infrastructure, this solution is perfect.""The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.""The solution is very easy to use. It's easy to navigate and to work with.""I am impressed with the product's security."

More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →

Cons
"We need another approach to bring the solution to the cloud. In addition to Access Management, we would like to see if we can jump into Directories. I think ADs are going to go away and everything is going to be cloud-based and minimize the use of ADs because of the cost and some other dependencies to the cloud. Every time you buy AD it is more hardware, and everything's changing to software. The network's changing, the applications are changing, and for IT it is hard to keep up with it.""The solution has two agents so should combine its enterprise application and security access into one agent.""The technical enablement sessions are quite limited, and Akamai could help by providing more of them."

More Akamai Enterprise Application Access Cons →

"Stability-wise, the service could be improved.""The initial setup was quite complex.""As an individual developer, I would like Google Cloud IAP to offer more flexibility, especially for smaller-scale usage.""The hard part is creating the pack because our applications are in Azure Data Proxy, Data Fabric, and Data Factory. Our team used these tools in Azure, but in the future, they will transition to GCP.""The integration of the solution for patching, updating, and installing the updates could be better.""the documentation could be a bit better in terms of what is presented on the screen versus what actually happens.""The solution should be more user-friendly and should have descriptive manuals on the page website.""There are certain shortcomings with the product's stability where improvements are required."

More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price is great it is all-inclusive, they use an enterprise cost model. That's what we like compared to other users. This is one of the main attractions of Akamai Enterprise Application Access. It's already an enterprise cost model established with us for services."
  • "Licensing is based on user count."
  • "The license can be shared based on the number of active users."
  • More Akamai Enterprise Application Access Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I think that the cost is metered based on the data, but I don't have the details."
  • "Its price is good. For each server, we are saving $300 a month. We have at least thousands of servers. It is a huge cost reduction for us."
  • "The customer purchases an annually sponsored license."
  • "I think the price of Google Cloud Platform is reasonable. However, Microsoft is the most cost-effective solution for us because of Azure's integration. And we already have licenses for Windows Server and the databases, so the price is attractive."
  • "When comparing the price of GCP to other solutions it provides more value for the money."
  • "The licensing costs us $100,000 so pricing could be better."
  • "It is expensive to scale up the solution."
  • "The solution is inexpensive for personal use."
  • More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is very convenient and stable because you don't have to worry about attacks to public IPs or public networks.
    Top Answer:The license can be shared based on the number of active users. If you have 5,000 users but only 1,000 active users at one time, then you buy a license for 1,000 users.
    Top Answer:The solution has two agents so should combine its enterprise application and security access into one agent. It is more comfortable for users if they don't have to install two agents.
    Top Answer:Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is expensive. However, it is inexpensive compared to on-premise deployment. Also, limited storage for primary usage is free of cost.
    Top Answer:The solution is a bit complex and could be made easier to use. The solution should have an easier knowledge base. The solution should have basic-level certifications that encourage people to start… more »
    Ranking
    14th
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    792
    Comparisons
    656
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    273
    Rating
    8.0
    7th
    out of 34 in ZTNA
    Views
    207
    Comparisons
    129
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    322
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Soha
    GCP Cloud IAP, Google Cloud Platform Cloud IAP, Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy
    Learn More
    Overview

    Akamai Enterprise Application Access is a cloud-based solution that provides secure access to enterprise applications and data from any device, anywhere. It eliminates the need for traditional VPNs and allows organizations to easily manage access to applications and data for employees, partners, and customers. With its zero-trust approach, it ensures that only authorized users can access sensitive information, reducing the risk of data breaches.

    Google’s mission is to organize the world‘s information and make it universally accessible and useful.

    Since our founding in 1998, Google has grown by leaps and bounds. From offering search in a single language we now offer dozens of products and services—including various forms of advertising and web applications for all kinds of tasks—in scores of languages. And starting from two computer science students in a university dorm room, we now have thousands of employees and offices around the world. A lot has changed since the first Google search engine appeared. But some things haven’t changed: our dedication to our users and our belief in the possibilities of the Internet itself.

    Sample Customers
    Bugcrowd, InPowered, Spirent Communications
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Healthcare Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Retailer17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Media Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Akamai Enterprise Application Access is ranked 14th in ZTNA as a Service with 3 reviews while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 7th in ZTNA with 43 reviews. Akamai Enterprise Application Access is rated 9.0, while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Akamai Enterprise Application Access writes "Very scalable, convenient, and stable protection against attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". Akamai Enterprise Application Access is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Zscaler Internet Access, Appgate SDP, Netskope and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Cisco Duo. See our Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy report.

    See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.