AlgoSec vs FireMon Security Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AlgoSec Logo
15,839 views|6,432 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
FireMon Logo
6,866 views|5,134 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Tufin Logo
11,923 views|6,941 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, Palo Alto Networks and others in Firewall Security Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Firewall Security Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We have been able to increase the effectiveness of the team, allowing them to prioritize more complex and business-critical tasks in a faster manner.""We can easily and quickly identify all of the rules on the firewall and avoid the individual review and analysis of each rule.""I like that the firewall will analyze the tools within the risk profiles and the policy optimizations within the AFA. This can also be used to create reports for the customer with the risk profiles to optimize the firewall rules.""Detection of malicious activities and malware is much better than other options.""Unused rules, hidden rules, and dangerous combinations of rules are easily found and tracked by using AlgoSec.""Firewall Analyzer is valuable because it makes searching our existing policies so simple.""We use it for global firewall rules management to ensure global policies are applied to all regional firewalls, provide auditing and compliance.""It enhanced the complete workflow system within six months of deployment."

More AlgoSec Pros →

"It gives us the ability to go to one place to look for potential firewall rules that are inappropriate, or which don't meet compliance. Instead of manually searching hundreds of firewalls for a policy, we can go to this one location and find the rules which are now out of compliance.""What I like about FireMon is the ability to track changes made by network engineers on the network.""I've been using the reports to see what is going on, and that is a helpful feature. We can track down unused rules, which helps with compliance. We can see rules that have not been used or that are duplicates or overly permissive.""It is a good product. Previously, we were using only spreadsheets to compare the usage, but now with FireMon, we are able to clean up or review the policies to some extent. It is still a work in progress, but we are at a good stage now.""Policy test, access path analysis, and change reports.""The ease of use is the most valuable feature. There are a lot of products out there, but the ability to navigate through and use Firemon is very good.""The automation that the platform provides to create tickets reduces human error and more generally, reduces the operational overhead.""The most valuable feature is that everything is recorded in the historical logs, including the firewall rules, headcounts, object-level usage, and the rule documentation. The rule certification details are also there, which means that someone can be held accountable for a specific firewall rule."

More FireMon Security Manager Pros →

"Being able to customize your own clarity to that aspect of change management.""I like the policy topology map, which allows us to visualize the picture of the security policy of the whole organization.""The stability is bulletproof.""It is a great solution. If you have all the devices and firewalls in place, the amount of details that you get along with the network topology is very good.""The features I have found most valuable are its capability to check on the firewall and the routers. Afterwards it checks out all the configs, checks the vulnerabilities, checks the risks - it checks everything that may end up causing our router to be compromised. At the end it recommendations what we should do.""This solution helps us ensure that security policy is followed across our entire hybrid network. You can have a Unified Security Policy which reaches across all networks, so if you are having a change submitted, it doesn't matter if you're enforcing it or not. You can get an alert saying, "This is a violation." That's a value-add.""This has helped us to better clean up and audit changes to the firewall policy.""The most valuable feature of Tufin is we have better visibility and management of our file infrastructure."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite Pros →

Cons
"Needs integration to cloud ITSM tools, such ServiceNow.""I would like to see enhanced dashboards or build meaningful reports for executive consumption.""Cisco Firepower device support is limited in our AlgoSec system and I think AlgoSec can improve in that area.""I believe Active Change needs to be improved because not all products are supported, and some functions cannot be implemented by Active Change either.""The pricing for smaller installations should be lowered because sometimes there is just no ROI to add AlgoSec to the small branch offices with only 10 rules.""We would like to have a kind of "Time Capsule" to be able to restore to a certain state from a backup.""The process to replace a decommissioned device with a new device is not straightforward.""I would like to be able to see what objects have the same IP, but different names in different firewalls."

More AlgoSec Cons →

"We've had recurring issues managing FireMon's internal backups. Sometimes, the space allocated for the backup is full, and there is no process where it deletes files that are older than I certain date. It's just waiting for the storage to get full and then it's cleaned up. It isn't something that creates serious issues for us.""A phone app would be nice. This is the reason why it is not perfect yet.""Its reporting can be improved. I am the only one who works a lot with it, and I am having problems in terms of reporting. In the case of Palo Alto, I'm okay with it, but with some of the Cisco devices, such as routers, when I provide the reports to other teams for review, they always say that the hit count is incorrect. So, I was struggling for a long time to work with them. When working with other teams, they have a lot of questions about reporting, such as how it reports, and we are still struggling with that.""The initial setup can take some time, including connecting it and configuring it. It's not something that is easy for anybody to do. There is time and energy required because of the number of systems you have to configure to get it to work properly.""The cost of the solution is pretty expensive. It would be ideal if they could work on their pricing.""The advanced features are complex in setting up the rules.""To my knowledge, there's no cloud component to FireMon whatsoever. We're on the hook for any updates to versioning of the operating system or the application that runs on the operating system. It would be nice if it was a little bit more automated.""FireMon could improve its end-user practices. As an end user, I am just trying to catch up on all the alerts. There are so many, and you still have to go through them and document what was found."

More FireMon Security Manager Cons →

"At least in our environment, the dynamic learning of the topology needs improvement.""The interface is like a 1990s kind of thing. It's a little ugly. There are many things that you cannot tweak, little things like the column width and how you display the information. You end up exporting everything to an Excel file and doing your work there.""It would be better if they modernized the web GUI. The web interface GUI is simple and not complicated, but it's also too old.""The documentation site is horrible as well. It has a tree structure, and you really get lost quite easily.""I wish there was a read-only admin option. I don't like that you have to be a full admin just to see the Network Topology Map. That option is great out there if you are a user, multi-domain user, etc. However, that piece is very helpful for us, but I also don't want to be handing out admin access to every single person so they can see that network tab.""I needed more help getting the product to work in the lab.""One of the areas that I've had challenges with is making complicated reports.""A limitation right now for compressed firewalls is the limited ability to see above a site level in terms of the Topology Mapping in the policy display. While Tufin's actively working on a solution, or at least they have this in the queue, from being able to view this on a higher level and how all of our site networks are connected, this ability would be useful, as we expect to have these compressed firewalls in place for quite some time."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is okay and the licensing can be a little tricky with the initial setup."
  • "AlgoSec may be little pricier with its licenses, but it is probably better than any of other competitors."
  • "I personally feel that the cost is quite expensive. AlgoSec is charging for each function, e.g., Active change, Application ABF license, etc."
  • "It is worth spending the cost for visibility on security. Of course, security is not cheap."
  • "It has improved our performance in operations, projects, and security.​"
  • "It will reduce your operations costs with improved team performance."
  • "Use the entire suite for its best benefits."
  • "Licensing is offered as a subscription and as a perpetual model."
  • More AlgoSec Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing model seems fair."
  • "Relative to what it offers, the price is fair."
  • "The pricing is very good, very straightforward. It also came in cheaper than AlgoSec and Tufin."
  • "Regarding additional costs, if you want things like Policy Optimizer, extra features, that's extra."
  • "We don't license all of the devices in our network, so it does not provide us with a comprehensive visibility of all devices in a hybrid network at this time."
  • "We pay for it yearly."
  • "FireMon is cheaper than AlgoSec."
  • "Pricing is reasonable."
  • More FireMon Security Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This solution helped us to reduce the time it takes to make changes. We used to spend up to an hour to do a change, and now, it's around five minutes."
  • "Tufin and AlgoSec were pretty much in the competitive price range, but this one provided us better integration into the Check Point environment."
  • "The solution has helped us to reduce the time it takes to make changes. With Tufin, it takes ten to 15 minutes. Before, it was 30 minutes or more."
  • "The solution has helped reduce the time it takes us to make changes. It helps make overall integrated changes immediately. It allows us to cut down at least a few hours in the week in regards to changes and monitoring."
  • "We've seen a decrease of about 50 percent in the overall time it takes to complete a firewall change."
  • "Tufin makes things a little easier. It lessens the amount of manual work which we have to do. It has a lot of benefits in terms of revenues, profits, employee costs, and operational costs. We have already seen return on investment."
  • "This solution helps us reduce the time it takes us to make changes. We're probably saving time by 25%."
  • "Tufin reduced the time it takes to solve a problem, which reduces the time of the outage."
  • More Tufin Orchestration Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AlgoSec's ability to integrate with various security and networking solutions enhances its overall value.
    Top Answer:The price is not the lowest, however, it is reasonable and offers good ROI.
    Top Answer:Enhancements that allow for more automated policy management, change workflows, and orchestration can significantly… more »
    Top Answer:I like the Security Manager console where we can see any changes that have been made or pull the results of an… more »
    Top Answer:It's a good value. From a licensing standpoint, our only limitation is the number of devices that we manage. Our… more »
    Top Answer:We've had recurring issues managing FireMon's internal backups. Sometimes, the space allocated for the backup is full… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Tufin is security auditing. We are able to check the rules and compliance of the company… more »
    Top Answer:Tuffin is expensive, and we have to explain to our customers the benefit for them to purchase. If we explain the… more »
    Top Answer:The reporting function could improve in Tufin. For our clients with companies that have strong compliance, reporting… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    15,839
    Comparisons
    6,432
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    621
    Rating
    8.9
    Views
    6,866
    Comparisons
    5,134
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    1,046
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    11,923
    Comparisons
    6,941
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    432
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tufin SecureCloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    AlgoSec, a global cybersecurity leader, empowers organizations to secure application connectivity and cloud-native applications throughout their multi-cloud and hybrid network. Trusted by more than 1,800 of the world’s leading organizations, AlgoSec’s application-centric approach enables to securely accelerate business application deployment by centrally managing application connectivity and security policies across the public clouds, private clouds, containers, and on-premises networks. Using its unique vendor-agnostic deep algorithm for intelligent change management automation, AlgoSec enables acceleration of digital transformation projects, helps prevent business application downtime and substantially reduces manual work and exposure to security risks. AlgoSec’s policy management and CNAPP platforms provide a single source for visibility into security and compliance issues within cloud-native applications as well as across the hybrid network environment, to ensure ongoing adherence to internet security standards, industry, and internal regulations. Learn how AlgoSec enables application owners, information security experts, DevSecOps and cloud security teams to deploy business applications up to 10 times faster while maintaining security at www.algosec.com.



    The increasing complexity of networks, driven by the constant influx of new devices, applications, and cloud services, presents a daunting challenge for managing firewall policies and rules. A typical enterprise environment has millions of rules, and just one simple misconfiguration can lead to devastating consequences like compliance violations, outages, and data breaches. 

    FireMon’s Security Manager is a purpose-built network security policy management (NSPM) platform that automates the management of firewall and cloud security policies to eliminate policy-related risk, accurately and quickly change rules, and meet internal and external compliance requirements.

    • Reduce Risk Manage risk with real-time visibility and control
    • Manage Change Avoid misconfigurations, accelerate business, and improve security
    • Enforce and Maintain Compliance Avoid violations, avoid risk, and avoid fines

    Tufin enables organizations to automate their security policy visibility, risk management, provisioning and compliance across their multi-vendor, hybrid environment. Customers gain visibility and control across their network, ensure continuous compliance with security standards and embed security enforcement into workflows and development pipelines. 

    Sample Customers
    Maersk, Delta Airlines, Chevron, General Motors, T-Mobile, Chevron, AT&T, BP, Bell Canada, HCA Healthcare, Morgan Stanley, Unilever, Nationwide Insurance Enterprise, US Bank, Microsoft 
    Convey, MGM Resorts International, Southwest Airlines, Alkami, Costco, Aetna, IBM, Verizon, Wells Fargo
    3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service 
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Insurance Company9%
    Government9%
    Computer Software Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Retailer6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Firewall Security Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, Palo Alto Networks and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: April 2024.
    769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.