Compare Amazon Pinpoint vs. Aprimo
Views
501
Comparisons
451
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
545
Comparisons
453
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Compared 59% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Teradata Aprimo
Amazon Web Services offers a highly scalable, low-latency, globally distributed architecture. Amazon Pinpoint is built on this architecture, allowing you to send messages to your customers through multiple channels with confidence. You can use these channels to send messages to recipients all around the world.
Aprimo gives enterprises the advantage by streamlining and governing all the behind-the-scenes activities - from ideation to distribution - involved in delivering exceptional brand experiences.
Learn more about Amazon Pinpoint
Learn more about Aprimo
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
AT&T, Bank of America, SOS Children's Village
Media Company40%
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm4%
No Data Available
Amazon Pinpoint is ranked 10th in Marketing Management while Aprimo is ranked 9th in Marketing Management. Amazon Pinpoint is rated 0.0, while Aprimo is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Amazon Pinpoint is most compared with Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Marketo, Adobe Campaign, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Google Campaign Manager, whereas Aprimo is most compared with BrandMaker, Workfront DAM, Teradata Customer Interaction Manager, Salesforce Marketing Cloud and Documentum Digital Asset Manager.
See our list of best Marketing Management vendors.
We monitor all Marketing Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.