We performed a comparison between Aruba Remote Access Points and Fortinet FortiClient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The product is very flexible. So far the stability of the solution has been good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is experienced by those working at home since they get a secure Wi-Fi connection."
"Aruba works well in large spaces, especially for manufacturing. That's when you start seeing the effectiveness of Aruba."
"The platform has the most valuable advanced filtering feature."
"Once configured and operational, they tend to function reliably, with few reported issues from clients or customers."
"It is a very stable tool."
"I can use the solution from my home or any remote office to access printers, servers, etc."
"This solution is widely adopted and involves both technology and non-technical devices. It is robust, except in cases of significant power outages."
"The initial setup is easy. Our clients use the FortiClient EMS, which is the central console for installing FortiClient. It is easy and very user friendly."
"I find it very easy to configure and also very stable."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"The EMS server gives us good control and central management."
"There is a lot of documentation available online."
"The setup for FortiClient is really straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiClient is its performance."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiClient are ease of use and simple configuration."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"It could have better monitoring features."
"There are some issues, like the VLAN capabilities and support for routing between two VMs."
"The product needs an increased level of security for the end user."
"Its scalability capabilities should be improved."
"It would help if the remote APs had some kind of SoHo environment with built-in firewall features. That way it could connect directly in a client-to-site type of environment, or a site-to-site VPN environment. That way users could have a complete office setup without coming to the private cloud."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing. If they can be more competitive."
"The solution's technical support has some shortcomings that need improvement."
"The solution is costly for medium-sized companies."
"The current version of this solution does not show the malicious websites that have been visited. They should add this to an upcoming release."
"When we change our endpoint, we have to connect again, which means having to enter our credentials and permissions."
"I think that FortiClient can enhance the multifactor authentication."
"It would be extremely useful to have an automatic updating feature."
"FortiClient's encryption key could be stronger so that it's not broken too easily."
"The pricing of the solution should be less expensive."
"I have yet to find the benefits of the latest upgraded version."
"Initially, the support was very poor. It is getting better, but they should continue to improve this."
Aruba Remote Access Points is ranked 13th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 13 reviews while Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 85 reviews. Aruba Remote Access Points is rated 7.8, while Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aruba Remote Access Points writes "The solution can be used from home or any remote office to access office resources like printers and servers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". Aruba Remote Access Points is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, OpenVPN Access Server, Check Point Remote Access VPN and Zyxel VPN Client, whereas Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. See our Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Fortinet FortiClient report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
