We performed a comparison between Aruba Remote Access Points and Check Point Remote Access VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"This solution is widely adopted and involves both technology and non-technical devices. It is robust, except in cases of significant power outages."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is experienced by those working at home since they get a secure Wi-Fi connection."
"Once configured and operational, they tend to function reliably, with few reported issues from clients or customers."
"It is a very stable tool."
"I can use the solution from my home or any remote office to access printers, servers, etc."
"The platform has the most valuable advanced filtering feature."
"The product is very flexible. So far the stability of the solution has been good."
"What I like best about Aruba Remote Access Points is that it's pretty easy to set up."
"The team has full visibility of the users that connect allowing them to keep control of who is in the network and what data they are allowing to come in and out."
"Scalability is great. We have been able to grow as a corporation due in part to this type of solution."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN provides strong security features, including encryption, authentication, endpoint security, access control, and centralized management."
"This platform has developed a reliable communication infrastructure that employees can use to communicate with remote workers."
"The ability to create your trigger data domains is the solution's most valuable feature."
"It is stable most of the time."
"The solution is easy to install, centrally managed, and stable, with good technical support and a straightforward setup."
"Technical support has been excellent."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The security side of Aruba Remote Access Points could be improved."
"The solution is costly for medium-sized companies."
"The solution's technical support has some shortcomings that need improvement."
"It would help if the remote APs had some kind of SoHo environment with built-in firewall features. That way it could connect directly in a client-to-site type of environment, or a site-to-site VPN environment. That way users could have a complete office setup without coming to the private cloud."
"There are some issues, like the VLAN capabilities and support for routing between two VMs."
"It could have better monitoring features."
"The product needs an increased level of security for the end user."
"Its scalability capabilities should be improved."
"The product’s architecture is a bit distributed."
"Connection of devices from various locations is efficient though there are a few challenges when there is a network failure."
"There is always room for innovation and the addition of new features."
"We would like to implement HTML5 (clientless access) in the product without installing any additional software."
"We have noted some stability issues."
"The Linux version may have an app (similar to Windows) instead of a shell script."
"I would like the support to be faster."
"Improved scalability would allow the solution to handle larger numbers of users and devices without a significant impact on performance."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Remote Access Points is ranked 13th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 13 reviews while Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 60 reviews. Aruba Remote Access Points is rated 7.8, while Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Aruba Remote Access Points writes "The solution can be used from home or any remote office to access office resources like printers and servers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". Aruba Remote Access Points is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, OpenVPN Access Server and Zyxel VPN Client, whereas Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange. See our Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Check Point Remote Access VPN report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
