Aruba Remote Access Points vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Netgate Logo
63 views|25 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
HPE Aruba Networking Logo
977 views|685 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
10,092 views|7,200 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aruba Remote Access Points and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution has good performance.""It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."

More Netgate TNSR Pros →

"Once configured and operational, they tend to function reliably, with few reported issues from clients or customers.""The most valuable feature of the solution is experienced by those working at home since they get a secure Wi-Fi connection.""This solution is widely adopted and involves both technology and non-technical devices. It is robust, except in cases of significant power outages.""Aruba Remote Access Points provide a level of protection for our IPs.""The product is very flexible. So far the stability of the solution has been good.""It is a very stable tool.""What I like best about Aruba Remote Access Points is that it's pretty easy to set up.""The platform has the most valuable advanced filtering feature."

More Aruba Remote Access Points Pros →

"The Azure tool is useful and powerful and availability for clients. The updates are very good and reliable.""It works perfectly for me. It is very user-friendly in terms of the configuration and the setup process.""The product has valuable virtual machines, viability options, and enhanced VPN services, enabling the option to use it in different zones.""The solution is very quick to connect.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is its performance. It is very fast.""It is easy to configure.""The point-to-site is pretty good for the B2C stuff. It's fairly straightforward to set up.""It is a stable solution in our company, and we monitor critical health and performance parameters daily and weekly."

More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway Pros →

Cons
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."

More Netgate TNSR Cons →

"The remote access point coverage should be bigger than it is now.""The solution is costly for medium-sized companies.""The product needs an increased level of security for the end user.""Our difficulty with Aruba is that the product and the license are two different items. So, if we are adding an access point, we have to pay for two items. We have to pay to add the access point in the controller and we have to pay for the license.""I use the controller when using Aruba Remote Access Points, particularly during configuration. Hence, room for improvement in Aruba Remote Access Points is for its web UI to be easier to control.""Its scalability capabilities should be improved.""The security side of Aruba Remote Access Points could be improved.""The solution's technical support has some shortcomings that need improvement."

More Aruba Remote Access Points Cons →

"Documentation and configuration settings can be improved.""In the next release, Microsoft should add an option to schedule upgrades.""The marketing material in the portal is not very user-friendly.""Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway could improve by providing IPS zero-day threat protection. For example, the IPS zero-day threat protection can monitor the user behavior to protect the infrastructure. The solution can only be used as a VPN, it is lacking features.""I would like for them to improve the troubleshooting features. We have some problems with traffic and I can't identify where the problem is coming from. I have to open a ticket with support until it gets resolved. Microsoft doesn't offer enough tools to resolve the issue.""They should release a less expensive version of the solution.""Their technical support could be better. If you don't have a support contract, it takes longer.""The connectivity should be faster."

More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is not a license required for this solution but the price should be less expensive."
  • More Netgate TNSR Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of Aruba Remote Access Points could be better. It is a little expensive."
  • "Price-wise, Aruba Remote Access Points is in the middle, so my rating for its pricing is three out of five."
  • "Aruba pricing is not very high. They offer competitive pricing for what they provide."
  • "You require no separate licensing to convert an access point to RAP."
  • "There are no other expenses than standard licenses for the product."
  • "In terms of pricing, we've found Aruba's offerings to be very competitive."
  • More Aruba Remote Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is a monthly license and the price depends on how many users are using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. The price could be less expensive."
  • "Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is the cheapest way for us to connect to our cloud infrastructure. Other solutions, such as ExpressRoute are very expensive."
  • "The cost could be lower."
  • "Payment for licensing the solution is part of the operating model. So, one needs to keep on paying while consuming the solution. In short, the payment is based on the solution's capacity."
  • "Its price is reasonable for new technology."
  • "The costs are quite high."
  • "The solution is subscription-based and very cheap."
  • "The software has good pricing compared to other vendors."
  • More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled.
    Top Answer:The product is very cost-effective and has no requirement for additional licenses. The setup is not easy. Users need… more »
    Top Answer:THe solution is used as a primary gateway with two lease lines of 450 Mbps total. Around 200 users are under it. There… more »
    Top Answer:Once configured and operational, they tend to function reliably, with few reported issues from clients or customers.
    Top Answer:In terms of pricing, we've found Aruba's offerings to be very competitive. We haven't encountered any significant issues… more »
    Top Answer:Its scalability capabilities should be improved.
    Top Answer:The point-to-site is pretty good for the B2C stuff. It's fairly straightforward to set up.
    Top Answer:I'd like to see no difference between point-to-site or site-to-site. For the Gen1 VPN Gateway, you can have a maximum of… more »
    Top Answer:It's limited in functionality, but it does the role that it's designed to do really well. Overall, I would rate the… more »
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    TNSR
    Aruba RAP
    MS Azure VPN Gateway
    Learn More
    Overview

    TNSR is an advanced open source-based secure networking software platform with highly-scalable packet processing, manageability, and service expansion capabilities. This video provides a high-level introduction. that address a number of commonly asked new product questions - in just a couple of minutes.

    emote APs connect to a controllerusing Extended Authentication and Internet Protocol Security (XAuth/IPSec). AP control and 802.11 data traffic are carried through this tunnel. Secure Remote Access Point Service extends the corporate office to the remote site. Remote users can use the same features as corporate office users. For example, voice over IP (VoIP) applications can be extended to remote sites while the servers and the PBX remain secure in the corporate office.

    Secure Remote Access Point Service can also be used to secure control traffic between an AP and the controllerin a corporate environment. In this case, both the AP and controllerare in the company’s private address space.

    A VPN gateway is a specific type of virtual network gateway that is used to send encrypted traffic between an Azure virtual network and an on-premises location over the public Internet. You can also use a VPN gateway to send encrypted traffic between Azure virtual networks over the Microsoft network. Each virtual network can have only one VPN gateway. However, you can create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway. When you create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway, all VPN tunnels share the available gateway bandwidth.

    Sample Customers
    UCLA, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, shopify
    Trafford Metropolitan Borough
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer13%
    Government13%
    Non Profit13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government13%
    Healthcare Company12%
    Computer Software Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Energy/Utilities Company29%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise53%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aruba Remote Access Points is ranked 13th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 13 reviews while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is ranked 4th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 18 reviews. Aruba Remote Access Points is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Remote Access Points writes "The solution can be used from home or any remote office to access office resources like printers and servers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway writes "A scalable and reliable solution that enables users to connect to older protocols that other products do not have". Aruba Remote Access Points is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, OpenVPN Access Server and Check Point Remote Access VPN, whereas Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and AWS PrivateLink. See our Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway report.

    See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.