We performed a comparison between Aruba Virtual Intranet Access and Cisco IOS SSL VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The solution is very user friendly."
"The user interface is user-friendly."
"The product's most valuable features are security, stability, and troubleshooting capabilities."
"It is very effective and I am satisfied with how it works and with its performance."
"It is a product that is very robust and durable."
"It's a very stable solution and I'd say it works perfectly."
"The feature I find most valuable, is the management portal."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN is stable, and once we connect, we don't face any issues and can do our work."
"The multicast feature is useful for us."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Configurations can be a bit complex."
"The graphical interface is old and needs to improve."
"It would be nice if we could use this not just on mobile, but on laptops and desktops as well."
"The product’s dashboard is not good enough."
"The pricing needs to be better."
"The pricing is a stumbling block to scaling our utilization of Cisco products and we would prefer to use more of them."
"The solution takes some time to log in because of some unavoidable security barriers, but it would be better if that could happen faster."
"The product costs a lot of money."
"Improvements could be made in terms of connectivity for applications."
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 31st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Cisco IOS SSL VPN is ranked 9th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 47 reviews. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 7.0, while Cisco IOS SSL VPN is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Virtual Intranet Access writes "Very user friendly but configurations can be a bit complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco IOS SSL VPN writes "The solution is very stable and scalable, but it is expensive, and the configuration is complicated". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whereas Cisco IOS SSL VPN is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Zyxel VPN Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Ivanti Connect Secure and Citrix Gateway.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
