We performed a comparison between Aruba Virtual Intranet Access and Fortinet FortiClient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The solution is very user friendly."
"The most valuable features are malware detection, integrates well with other solutions, and ease of use for all users."
"From my perspective as an end user, it's consistently stable, and I would rate the stability as a nine out of ten."
"It's got a very friendly user interface."
"FortiClient's most valuable features are that it's easy to install and connect and has OTP on email IDs and two-factor authentication."
"The technical support from Fortinet and local vendors is good."
"It's easy to use, easy to deploy, and I have more visibility over my network that shows which users are connected to the firewalls, which users are connected to the network, and what they're accessing."
"The solution is stable, we have not had any issues in the time we have been using it."
"It is not at all interesting for me as a standalone product, but as a product that is integrated with FortiGate with all features, it is actually a great tool and a great experience. I had test installed FortiClient working from home. I remembered and knew which web categories were denied or allowed. All those policies were correctly reflected standalone, for example, on my laptop."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Configurations can be a bit complex."
"I would like to see endpoint detection and response included."
"There is lagging in some of the authentication tools to support the newer versions, this is happening because they are not supported."
"The documentation could be improved."
"When we change our endpoint, we have to connect again, which means having to enter our credentials and permissions."
"The features of Fortinet FortiClient could be improved."
"There should be more frequent releases or updates."
"It would be nice to see more in hand features in terms of the DLP, so that the solution can be integrated with the DLP, as well as more reporting features on the end point."
"While I cannot think of new features to add, it would be nice if the reports were improved, to have these sent automatically."
Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is ranked 31st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 85 reviews. Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is rated 7.0, while Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aruba Virtual Intranet Access writes "Very user friendly but configurations can be a bit complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". Aruba Virtual Intranet Access is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whereas Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.