Most Helpful Review
Researched Aruba Wireless but chose Fortinet Wireless: Create guest networks without a VLAN, easy to use, and has a user-friendly GUI
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
It has an aesthetically pleasing GUI for configuration.
The most valuable feature of Aruba Wireless is application monitoring.
It helps the user to have a better vision of what is happening in their network.
I have found the Access Point (AP) group profile feature extremely useful. It makes deployments look easy.
It has helped in making deployments easier.
It delivers constantly, there is no break in the internet using these devices. It also automatically gets connected when the internet comes back. Failure is very low.
The performance and the application monitor. You can select the applications you want to use and block on your network
With the central management system, I'm able to access each device. I can configure one device and then it provisions all the other devices with the same configuration, rather than my having to configure them one by one.
This is the only product on the market currently that supports as many access points for wifi users.
The most valuable feature is the ability to connect and broadcast to different networks without using a VLAN or a layer two switch, which allows you to easily create guest networks.
The firewall integration is very important for the security of the connection.
With Fortinet, there is a feature called Network-In-Control. It's the AP controller that decides what the clients are going to connect to... Even though your phone sees, let's say, two APs, since the wireless controller has visibility into and access across all the APs, it knows the best AP for the client to connect to. This way, the controller makes sure that none of the APs is over-crowded, and the spectrum is used properly.
If you do have a FortiGate Firewall somewhere in the network, you can connect the wireless controller to that... You get 100 percent visibility from a single point... You can see everything that's connected to the FortiGate, whether it's a switch or a wireless AP or a wireless controller or any other Fortinet product.
Having the single pane of glass, by using the Fortinet Security Fabric, allows us to tighten security, and more easily and quickly create additional VLANs to help protect data. Rules in the firewall mean we can protect data and systems so that, should anything go wrong, any security issue is held to an individual device.
We can deploy a tunnel-based VLAN and SSID, for something that happens at the last minute, in a matter of minutes, because of the interaction between the FortiGate, the FortiSwitches, and the FortiAPs.
Security is the feature we like most from Fortinet. In general, their security architecture is really great, because it involves everything: firewalls, wireless LANs, the user. Everything is really secure.
The urgent areas of improvement would be customer support, better tuned default settings, and documentation.
For a more senior tool, a local application monitoring related to IoT vendors would be useful.
They should provide usage guides and solutions to frequent problems.
They should simplify the configuration flow.
Additional detailed reporting for client traffic would be a great addition.
What I would like to have with these kinds of devices is the most enhanced security. For example, if I could apply security from wireless devices, that would be great. I would also like more enhanced reports on user adoption, who is getting what bandwidth.
I would like to be able to customize Captive Portals.
The management system would be better if it were more polished, if it had a better interface like, for example, Meraki
The pricing model can be improved to encourage use by small business and individuals and the hardware could stand to be redesigned.
The guest management features need to be improved by adding automation.
This solution should be easier to set up in a production environment.
One of the main features that I see as lacking in any of the Fortinet products is the reporting. If you want to have proper, end-to-end reporting, you must purchase the FortiAnalyzer... If Fortinet could offer some better, built-in reporting, that would be a point of improvement.
There is very little publicly available information about Virtual Cell and Single Channel Architecture. Promotion of the overall technology is limited as well. Being more vocal about a product that has many advantages would go a long way to eliminating a lot of the confusion and negative perception about Virtual Cell and Single Channel Architecture.
Licensing is the only area that I think they are below average. They need enterprise licensing, an all-encompassing license to cover all products for a company.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Get multiple bids/quotes, and talk to the representatives about the limitations of the product; pretty standard.
It's not expensive. That is the reason we switched to Aruba.
Pricing is competitive. Licensing is needed to maintain access to the latest firmware, which wasn't made clear originally when we started with Arbua (or things changed, I'm not sure which). I would just say, make sure you budget for it.
A recent change is that ClearPass licensing is superb. It counts user-based instead of device-based, for BYOD on-boarding.
AP signal strength and price. I know this is a competitive market, but APs should not cost so much if they do not cover a large area.
The system was very good, but we needed to upgrade in order to adapt for our needs, and doing so with Aruba would have been more expensive.
Besides paying for the APs, you need to pay a license each year for their use. Therefore, watch out for that and do the best you can to keep costs down.
I am aiding in transitioning my organization to a different wireless solution due to the cost. We need to expand our network and the cost of new APs and an upgraded controller have proved to be prohibitive compared to similar solutions on the market.
Fortinet would do something with their pricing model to attract smaller business users and eliminate the mandatory service contracts.
For indoor access points, there is a one-time cost, upfront, whereas outdoor access points have an annual fee.
If a customer already is a FortiGate customer, the cost to go to the FortiAP is incredibly affordable, because you already have the controller.
Licensing has become easier. There is no longer a per-AP license needed on the controller.
out of 22 in Wireless LAN
Average Words per Review
out of 22 in Wireless LAN
Average Words per Review
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Also Known As
|Aruba WLAN, HP WLAN, HP Wireless||FortiAP, Fortinet AP/OAP, Meru Wireless LAN|
|Aruba deliver superb Wireless performance and multi-user MIMO aware ClientMatch to boost network efficiency and support the growing device density and app demands on your network.|
Consolidate security and wireless LAN management with our integrated wireless solutions. Single-pane-of-glass management for security and access without the need to add point products simplifies deployment and reduces management complexity. These solutions are highly scalable to support even the largest organizations and distributed enterprises.
Learn more about Aruba Wireless
Learn more about Fortinet Wireless
|Consulate Health Care, Los Angeles Unified School District, Science Applications International Corp (SAIC), San Diego State University, KFC, ACTS Retirement-Life Communities||Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data|
K 12 Educational Company Or School12%
Comms Service Provider12%
Software R&D Company24%
Comms Service Provider20%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
Software R&D Company19%
Comms Service Provider14%
K 12 Educational Company Or School7%
No Data Available