Asana vs Procore Project Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Asana Logo
5,632 views|4,064 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Procore Technologies Logo
404 views|350 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Asana and Procore Project Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Project Management Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"My task box displays all of our tasks, organized by day, helping us to focus on what needs to be done each day.""The solution appears to be quite stable.""Asana is a very simple interface for project managers to figure out, providing all the functions they need.""It is stable and easy to set up.""What I like the most about Asana is its API integrations because we use a lot of cluttered toolsets in our company since we need to cater to different clients, for which its integration gives us a lot of flexibility.""I love the way it monitors all of the current and past projects, and it sends notifications to keep everything on the track.""It has helped our departments maintain visibility.""What I like most about Asana is its simplicity. For example: we're not the only ones using it, and we onboard our customers to it, and normally, they have no questions."

More Asana Pros →

"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."

More Procore Project Management Pros →

Cons
"We don't get enough notifications.""We tried, but we haven't been successful with it. If people don't have the training, it is not easy to use. You need to make sure that the people are trained to use the system. They can provide more resources in the form of webcasts and videos that people can use to train themselves and understand how to use it.""You need to have an action plan, otherwise, it won't be as effective.""It's hard to integrate Asana into other parts of the company workflow, so integration is an area for improvement.""Auto-shift is an essential feature for planning, but it's currently not there. It should have this feature so that when you move a task that depends on another task, the dates should be auto-shifted. For example, you have two tasks dependent on each other. When the parent task is moved or delayed, the child task should also be delayed, and the date should be shifted. When we have a very long timeline, it's very complex to go task by task and shift the dates on the task. Auto-shift is a fantastic and basic feature of project management, and having such a feature in Asana would make our lives much easier. If Asana added this feature, it would complete the suit and close the project management cycle because currently, there is a gap.""The messaging feature could be better.""On the development side for technical project management, Asana is missing features. We only use it for discussing tasks and strategies, and we use it for customer to-do lists. It doesn't have the source code integration that Jira and Jira Service Desk both have.""It would be beneficial if Asana had a predecessor feature that automatically adjusts all subsequent dates when changes are made to a timeline. For example, if I assign a designer four hours for one task and two days for another, and the completion of a task takes longer than anticipated, it would be convenient if updating one date could prompt the adjustment of all other relevant dates. Essentially, this feature would streamline the process and eliminate the need for manual adjustments."

More Asana Cons →

"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."

More Procore Project Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of this solution makes it quite accessible, and the plans fit my budget."
  • "Asana has two different types of structures: company vs workspace. Company is really best if all the users you plan to assign work to are all internal (have the same corporate domain in their user ID email address). Once one person signs up (even for a free account) with a corporate email address, Asana will automatically relate that person to that company, if it already exists. If you plan to use it for external collaboration as well as internal, then creating a workspace is a better approach."
  • "It has a free version."
  • "There is a free version of Asana, but we use the paid version to receive all the features we want. The overall price is reasonable."
  • "Its price is fair. Its licensing cost is cheaper than Microsoft Project. I would rate it a two out of five in terms of pricing."
  • "For what it brings to the table, I think Asana is fairly affordable. I would like to see the portfolio feature in our pricing plan, but other than that, it's definitely pretty good."
  • "We're on the business tier, which is $25 a month if you're on an annual contract. It's $31 if you're on a month-to-month contract. In my experience, there are no hidden costs with Asana. I know Smartsheet has these add-ons that you can buy, which is an additional cost, but Asana doesn't have any add-ons that I know of. When you're trying to scale the product and want to add users, you have to do it in buckets of five. This is also something to consider."
  • "This solution is reasonably priced."
  • More Asana Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten."
  • More Procore Project Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's user interface is very good.
    Top Answer:Currently, I'm using Asana for free. The solution's free version can be used for basic functions. When my colleagues start using it, I will contact Asana and find the most efficient plan for us.
    Top Answer:The financial side of Procore Project Management is better.
    Top Answer:The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,632
    Comparisons
    4,064
    Reviews
    28
    Average Words per Review
    555
    Rating
    8.4
    24th
    Views
    404
    Comparisons
    350
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    204
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Asana is web-based software-as-a-service that helps teams coordinate and manage their work. It helps companies move faster by making sure everyone knows the team’s plan and process and who is doing what by when.

    Each user can create projects using a list, board, calendar, or timeline view. Within each project, users can add tasks, subtasks, sections, comments, attachments, start and due dates, and custom fields. Project and task followers get notifications on changes or comments on the project and/or task in their Inbox. Individual users can see all of the tasks they're responsible for across all of their projects in a view called My Tasks.

    Asana is available in English, French, Spanish, German, and Portuguese.

    Procore Technologies, Inc. provides cloud-based construction software to clients across the globe. Using its award-winning suite of project management tools, hundreds of thousands of registered Procore users manage all types of construction projects including industrial plants, office buildings, apartment complexes, university facilities, retail centers, and more.

    Sample Customers
    Uber, Vodaphone, NASA, Spotify, Lyft, Baggu, Udacity, Patreon, Flipboard, Dropbox, Intel, Samsung, Airbnb, SFMoma, Hubspot, Trivago
    Consigli,Doran,Harvey,HITT,Mortenson construction,Robins and Morton
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Non Profit13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Legal Firm13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization49%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government11%
    Retailer9%
    Construction Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business73%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise55%
    Large Enterprise31%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Project Management Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Asana is ranked 3rd in Project Management Software with 43 reviews while Procore Project Management is ranked 24th in Project Management Software with 1 review. Asana is rated 8.4, while Procore Project Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Asana writes "Stands out with portfolios, easy setup, and real-time information, but needs big improvement when it comes to workflows, automation, and dashboards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Procore Project Management writes "Helps with project management and offers good value for money". Asana is most compared with Microsoft Project, Wrike, Microsoft Azure DevOps, monday.com and Jira, whereas Procore Project Management is most compared with EcoSys, SAP Portfolio and Project Management, Planview PPM Pro, Meridian Proliance PPM and Planisware.

    See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

    We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.