We compared Asana and Jira based on our users reviews in six parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Asana's setup process was considered simple and easy, requiring minimal training. In contrast, the setup for Jira had mixed opinions, with some finding it straightforward and others finding it more challenging.
Asana is known for its efficient project and task sharing among team members, while Jira is recognized for its user-friendly interface. Asana offers extensive customization and effective task management, while Jira provides flexibility and customization choices.
Both Asana and Jira have areas that can be enhanced. Asana could improve scalability for larger teams, offer more user training resources, enhance integration with other workflows, provide customization options, and simplify the user interface. On the other hand, Jira needs improvements in compatibility with Microsoft Word, export options, user interface and experience, customization options, reporting and tracking features, integration with other platforms, documentation, workflows, and permissions management.
Asana and Jira have varying setup costs according to users. Asana is considered reasonably priced, while Jira's affordability is a matter of mixed opinions. Asana does not have any undisclosed expenses and adds users in groups of five, whereas Jira's pricing and billing system is transparent.
Asana users have experienced positive outcomes in terms of time investment, productivity, and business growth, resulting in a favorable return on investment. On the other hand, Jira users have not yet determined their ROI, but instead emphasize qualitative advantages and the importance of organizational structure.
The feedback on customer service and support for Asana and Jira is varied. Asana users express dissatisfaction with the absence of a supportive community and slow response times. On the other hand, Jira users highlight the necessity for better technical support and complain about receiving irrelevant responses.
Comparison Results
Asana is highly praised for its user-friendly setup and ease of use. Users appreciate its ability to share projects and tasks among team members, as well as its high level of customization and task management capabilities. The real-time updates are also a valuable feature. However, there is room for improvement in terms of scalability, integration with other workflows, and customization options. On the other hand, Jira's setup complexity varies, but it is valued for its user-friendly interface and customization options. Users appreciate its integration with other Atlassian products. However, there are areas for improvement, such as compatibility with Microsoft Word, better UI/UX, more customization options, and enhanced reporting features. Opinions on pricing vary for both products. Asana users appreciate its basic solutions, while Jira users find it comprehensive. Customer support for both products has mixed reviews.
"This solution is easier and faster to use compared to Jira. It's not very structured and you can add sub-tasks and issues easily."
"It has helped our departments maintain visibility."
"The solution appears to be quite stable."
"The tool has a lot of integrations."
"It is pretty comprehensive when it comes to the different views that it gives you. It gives you a Gantt chart view, calendar view, board view, and list view. It is kind of helpful to have different types of views and see how it views your different tasks. I appreciate being able to do that. The biggest thing is that it is extremely user friendly. Asana is pretty intuitive. Someone who is not tech-savvy can kind of catch on quickly. It is better than other tools like Smartsheet. Some of the other tools like Microsoft Project and Excel are great tools, but you have to invest a lot of time to learn them, which is not the case with Asana."
"My task box displays all of our tasks, organized by day, helping us to focus on what needs to be done each day."
"The only thing I love about the product is that it is beautiful."
"I really enjoy the portfolios in Asana. One of the ways Asana stands out to me is with portfolios. You can have all your different projects, and you can have those assigned to different teams. If you want to customize a grouping of projects, you can use portfolios. For instance, one of the things that we do is we can assign a portfolio to a specific strategic objective we have, and we can put all those projects that are related to that strategic objective in that portfolio. We then know exactly what people are working on to help us achieve our goals. So, I really like portfolios."
"The solution works well and does what it needs to do."
"When we run the Jenkins pipeline, the build is already automatically connected to Jira. We've been able to integrate the ecosystem we created using this automation tool."
"It is easy to deploy in the cloud and other environments. It is also easy to view the reports of the sprint review or the sprint plan and the relation between the backlog and the repositories."
"The most valuable features in Jira are the dashboard, reports, and boards that help us to control the advancement of the project."
"JQL, JIRA Query Language enables me to filter all the issues, display the items as I want."
"The most valuable feature of Jira is the integration with all the different Atlassian tools. They all integrate very easily."
"I have found the tracking, project and task management most valuable in this solution."
"JIRA's technical support is absolutely fantabulous. I had used it in the past when I was working at my previous organization. And when we wanted to link it with a framework, they helped us out with the API we were looking for."
"More features can be added."
"The mobile application of Asana has to be improved a lot because no one wants to do a complete project management task on mobile."
"In Asana, there's no way to add a custom date field."
"If you have been using a tool like Jira for many years, it make time some time to get used to the minimalist layout in Asana."
"You need to have an action plan, otherwise, it won't be as effective."
"The documentation could be enhanced by incorporating more visually informative videos that demonstrate how to accomplish specific tasks. While Asana's community support is valuable for answering questions, finding precise answers often requires sifting through multiple posts. Having concise and explanatory videos would greatly improve the user experience. When searching on platforms like Google, there are many individuals sharing their approaches to using Asana. However, the information provided is often not directly applicable to one's specific needs. Therefore, it would be advantageous to have comprehensive video tutorials that address common user queries. This would provide a more efficient and intuitive way of accessing information, especially when it comes to learning how to navigate and utilize Asana's features effectively."
"It would be great if Asana could create a library for each project within the interface."
"The messaging feature could be better."
"I would like to see more integration available with more tools."
"They could improve the solution by having a multiple project dashboard to be able to manage many projects KPI's at once, this would really be helpful."
"It should have Behavior Driven Development (BDD). There should be an option to add macros to help with that. A lot of people are using it now, and it would be nice if there was a way in there to be able to generate the BDD of commands whenever you're creating a story."
"I struggle with Epics, how they are implemented in JIRA, because they don't work like any other Story, I see a list of Epics, but although I can order them, there are some mismatches with how the Epics are used compared to what Scrum expects, or what Story mapping expects an Epic to be."
"If CI/CD is integrated with it, it would be better. I've used Azure DevOps before, and it's nice to have everything, such as CI/CD Repos and other things, integrated. Jira has fewer integrations. Azure DevOps has an easier interface, and it has got everything in one spot. I don't have to jump around in different applications."
"The challenge which I frequently see from Jira is the label. When you search for a label sometimes, it suddenly disappears. If there's a mismatch due to all-caps or lower case, you won't be able to find it. It won't even come up as a recommendation or suggestion. That's something that can be really frustrating, as people create labels in their own specific ways and then no one else can find anything."
"Lacks field-level permission in the cloud version."
"End-to-end management from product backlog to test completion could be improved."
Asana is ranked 3rd in Project Management Software with 43 reviews while Jira is ranked 5th in Project Management Software with 259 reviews. Asana is rated 8.4, while Jira is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Asana writes "Stands out with portfolios, easy setup, and real-time information, but needs big improvement when it comes to workflows, automation, and dashboards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". Asana is most compared with Microsoft Project, Wrike, Microsoft Azure DevOps, monday.com and Trello, whereas Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM. See our Asana vs. Jira report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
