Compare Aurea CX Messenger vs. Software AG Optimize for Infrastructure

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution offers excellent stability."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros »

"The infrastructure monitoring features are the most valuable. The primary purpose of Software AG Optimize for Infrastructure is to automate the aspects of monitoring various infrastructure and applications. They will definitely automate an alert automatically, but a lot of such tools differ from each other on aspects of various low-level components that they can monitor."

More Software AG Optimize for Infrastructure Pros »

Cons
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons »

"Sometimes Software AG Optimize for Infrastructure goes through an upgrade cycle of four years to get to the next version. Some of the utilities need to be definitely advanced as well so that migration to the latest version is even smoother and easier. That could probably be the only improvements that they can look at. I definitely think that their cloud version capabilities are still nascent. They need to evolve into offering similar capabilities to the cloud infrastructure as well. That is not specifically SaaS but any managed infrastructure that customers would subscribe to in AWS, Azure, and other public clouds. How to employ Software AG Optimize for Infrastructure and also to see if it can be subscribed as a service from Software AG would be the ideal next steps for this solution to evolve into."

More Software AG Optimize for Infrastructure Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Activity Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
442,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution offers excellent stability.
Top Answer: The licensing costs on a yearly basis are around $200,000. There are no additional costs besides the licensing fees. For example, you do not have to pay extra for technical support, etc.
Top Answer: The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
1,673
Comparisons
791
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
495
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
42
Comparisons
9
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
964
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQwebMethods Optimize for Infrastructure
Learn
Aurea
Software AG
Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

Optimize for Infrastructure is a Business Activity Monitoring (BAM) solution that gives you real-time insight into the performance of webMethods Integration Server and Universal Messaging—the servers they run on and the applications they’re hosting. You can:

  • Optimize performance with precise, up-to-the-minute infrastructure visibility.
  • Prevent costly business disruptions with proactive alerts highlighting potential system problems before they occur.
  • Reduce the “noise” and focus on the real issues via intelligent self-learning.
Offer
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Learn more about Software AG Optimize for Infrastructure
Sample Customers
Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom MortgageSwisscom
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
International Affairs Institute11%
Retailer8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
No Data Available
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 5th in Business Activity Monitoring with 1 review while Software AG Optimize for Infrastructure is ranked 4th in Business Activity Monitoring with 1 review. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 8.0, while Software AG Optimize for Infrastructure is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Excellent stability, capable of scaling, and good at supporting security particulars". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Software AG Optimize for Infrastructure writes "Mature, stable, and powerful managed platform". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, ActiveMQ, VMware RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, whereas Software AG Optimize for Infrastructure is most compared with .

See our list of best Business Activity Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Business Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.