We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation and SAS rPath [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is ranked 17th in Release Automation while SAS rPath [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Release Automation. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is rated 8.0, while SAS rPath [EOL] is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of Automic Continuous Delivery Automation writes "Reduces our time to market considerably with automated and consistent results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS rPath [EOL] writes "Be sure of what you want before implementation as it can be costly to correct a mistake". Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is most compared with UrbanCode Deploy, Nolio Release Automation and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas SAS rPath [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Release Automation vendors.
We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.