Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Overview

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is the #8 ranked solution in our list of top Release Automation tools. It is most often compared to AutoSys Workload Automation: Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

What is Automic Continuous Delivery Automation?

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar. 

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is also known as CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform.

Buyer's Guide

Download the Release Automation Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: July 2021

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Customers

BET365, Charter Communications, TASC

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Video

Pricing Advice

What users are saying about Automic Continuous Delivery Automation pricing:
  • "Customers often complain about the price."

Filter Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
RG
Project Manager at a financial services firm
Real User
Good interface, excellent event monitoring, and capability to scale

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for job run file transfers.

Pros and Cons

  • "The event monitor is very good. You can monitor when the file is created so you can pick up the file once it's done."
  • "There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them."

What other advice do I have?

We use the on-premises deployment model. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I'd rate it higher if the installation was easier and if their file transfers were faster.
MD
Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Automatic installation for complex deployments and environments, with good workflow support

What is our primary use case?

Indirectly, we are providing solutions for our clients. We are consultants for our customers and act as system integrators.

Pros and Cons

  • "You can design your workflows for your needs."
  • "The stability of the solution can be improved."

What other advice do I have?

Both Ansible and Atomic are good. Automic is more for complex installation for the enterprise. If I want to deploy applications such as Linux, AIX, Windows Server, and a Database and I have a complex environment, it's better to use Automic. If I just have a Linux machine, it is best to use Ansible. I have heard that Ansible has improved its capabilities in the last couple of years. We are very happy with this solution but the customers are not happy with the price, therefore I would rate Automic Continuous Delivery Automation an eight out of ten.
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Red Hat, IBM and others in Release Automation. Updated: July 2021.
523,372 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RM
IT Process Automation Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Has good IT process automation but the user interface is new and needs improvement

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is for the deployment of web service applications.

Pros and Cons

  • "The IT process automation is the most valuable aspect of this solution."
  • "Not a perfect ten because the user interface is brand new and it needs improvement."

What other advice do I have?

I would rate it a seven out of ten. Not a perfect ten because the user interface is brand new and it needs improvement. My advice to someone considering this solution is to be very flexible with this product. You can automate everything you want. The naming of the object is very important because the user's rights depends on the naming of the object. In the next release, I would like for them to include a workflow engine that I also can automate business processes and not just IT processes.