Compare Aviatrix vs. Cisco SD-WAN

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aviatrix Logo
1,010 views|747 comparisons
Cisco SD-WAN Logo
19,142 views|16,030 comparisons
Top Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"We pay for the Cisco Customer Care support, which is a couple of hundred dollars.""80 percent reduction in WAN costs. There are no MPLS or P2P circuits left in the organization.""Cisco is more expensive than some competing products.""SD-WAN as a service is probably something in the neighborhood of $100 to $200 a month per location.""The costs are a bit on the high side.""It is much cheaper than other solutions. Most of our clients are the top 500 companies, and they all have a corporate contract.""The license model is too complex with too many flavors and options. You might not be able to see it from an end user's point of view, but from a telco point of view, their license model is too complex. They should have a flexible license model. If you want to have good pricing, you need to buy it for a two-year, four-year, or five-year license immediately. Some other vendors have much more flexible license models.""It is going to be on a yearly basis. There are no additional costs."

More Cisco SD-WAN Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Networking (SDN) solutions are best for your needs.
534,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The solution can scale. We haven't had any issues doing so.
Top Answer: I can't speak to the costs associated with the product. We get involved with just the installations, that's all.
Top Answer: The quality could always continuously improve. For example, we've had stability concerns in the past. Native connectivity into the major cloud providers would be ideal. Often, the solution does… more »
Ranking
Views
1,010
Comparisons
747
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
19,142
Comparisons
16,030
Reviews
33
Average Words per Review
606
Rating
7.9
Comparisons
Also Known As
Viptela, Cisco vEdge Cloud Router
Learn More
Overview

The Aviatrix solution consists of two components: the Aviatrix Gateway, which is deployed on-premises or in the cloud; and the Aviatrix Cloud Controller, which orchestrates and manages one or more Gateways.

Deploy software-defined WAN without compromising the application experience.

Offer
Learn more about Aviatrix
Learn more about Cisco SD-WAN
Sample Customers
Hyatt, Robert Half, GREE
Doyle Research, Ashton Metzler & Associates
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider32%
Computer Software Company17%
Media Company10%
Financial Services Firm6%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider44%
Transportation Company11%
Real Estate/Law Firm11%
Computer Software Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider38%
Computer Software Company22%
Manufacturing Company4%
Government4%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business49%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise34%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise63%

Aviatrix is ranked 9th in Software Defined Networking (SDN) while Cisco SD-WAN is ranked 2nd in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 38 reviews. Aviatrix is rated 0.0, while Cisco SD-WAN is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco SD-WAN writes "Stable, cutting-edge, and robust". Aviatrix is most compared with VMware NSX, IBM SDN, Meraki SD-WAN, Big Switch Networks and Juniper Contrail Networking, whereas Cisco SD-WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, VMware SD-WAN, Versa FlexVNF, Meraki SD-WAN and Nuage Networks.

We monitor all Software Defined Networking (SDN) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.