We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and GoCD based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control."
"The tool's recent version helps us to run pipelines in parallel. The integration with other AWS services has greatly impacted our use of AWS CodePipeline. It made tasks such as integrating with Jira and provisioning instances much easier."
"Code deployment is the best feature."
"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."
"AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing."
"In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."
"The integrations are good."
"The product is cost-effective and integrates well with the AWS environment."
"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."
"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."
"The UI is colorful."
"There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base."
"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."
"It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks."
"The tool does not provide automated features for evidence collection."
"The support team’s response time must be improved."
"The setup time is a bit long."
"In the next release, I would like to see fewer timeout errors."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."
"The tool must be more user-friendly."
"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 4th in Build Automation with 13 reviews while GoCD is ranked 8th in Build Automation with 6 reviews. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while GoCD is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GoCD writes "User-friendly, useful multiple pipeline capabilities, and low resource consumption". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and Bitrise, whereas GoCD is most compared with GitLab, Tekton, Microsoft Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions and UrbanCode Deploy. See our AWS CodePipeline vs. GoCD report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
